Paper detail

Counting list matrix partitions of graphs

Given a symmetric D*D matrix M over {0,1,*}, a list M-partition of a graph G is a partition of G's vertices into D parts associated with the rows of M. The part of each vertex is chosen from a given list so that no edge of G maps to a 0 in M and no non-edge of G maps to a 1 in M. Many important graph-theoretic structures can be represented as list M-partitions, such as graph colourings, split graphs and homogeneous sets and pairs, which arise in the proofs of the weak and strong perfect graph conjectures. There has been quite a bit of work on determining for which matrices M computations involving list M-partitions are tractable. We focus on counting list M-partitions, given a graph G and a list for each vertex of G. We identify a set of "tractable" matrices and give an algorithm that counts list M-partitions in polynomial time for every (fixed) matrix M in this set. The algorithm uses data structures such as sparse-dense partitions and subcube decompositions to reduce each instance to a sequence of instances in which the lists restrict access to portions of M in which the interaction of 0s and 1s is controlled. We solve the resulting restricted instances by converting them into counting constraint satisfaction problems (#CSPs) which we solve using arc-consistency. For every matrix M for which our algorithm fails, we show that counting list M-partitions is #P-complete. Further, we give an explicit characterisation of the dichotomy theorem: counting list M-partitions is in FP if M has a structure called a derectangularising sequence; otherwise, counting list M-partitions is #P-hard. We show that the meta-problem of determining whether a given matrix has a derectangularising sequence is NP-complete. Finally, we show that lists can be used to encode cardinality restrictions in M-partitions problems and use this to give a polynomial-time algorithm for counting homogeneous pairs in graphs.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.