BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

David Richerby

David Richerby appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematicsmath.COmath.PRPopulations and EvolutionSocial and Information NetworksComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceData Structures and AlgorithmsDatabases

Catalog footprint

What is connected

14works
9topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

14 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

FLUID: A Common Model for Semantic Structural Graph Summaries Based on Equivalence Relations

Summarization is a widespread method for handling very large graphs. The task of structural graph summarization is to compute a concise but meaningful synopsis of the key structural information of a graph. As summaries may be used for many different purposes, there is no single concept or model of graph summaries. We have studied existing structural graph summaries for large-scale (semantic) graphs. Despite their different concepts and purposes, we found commonalities in the graph structures they capture. We use these commonalities to provide for the first time a formally defined common model, FLUID (FLexible graph sUmmarIes for Data graphs), that allows us to flexibly define structural graph summaries. FLUID allows graph summaries to be quickly defined, adapted, and compared for different purposes and datasets. To this end, FLUID provides features of structural summarization based on equivalence relations such as distinction of types and properties, direction of edges, bisimulation, and inference. We conduct a detailed complexity analysis of the features provided by FLUID. We show that graph summaries defined with FLUID can be computed in the worst case in time $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ w.r.t. $n$, the number of edges in the data graph. An empirical analysis of large-scale web graphs with billions of edges indicates a typical running time of $Θ(n)$. Based on the formal FLUID model, one can quickly define and modify various structural graph summaries from the literature and beyond.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Amplifiers for the Moran Process

The Moran process, as studied by Lieberman, Hauert and Nowak, is a randomised algorithm modelling the spread of genetic mutations in populations. The algorithm runs on an underlying graph where individuals correspond to vertices. Initially, one vertex (chosen u.a.r.) possesses a mutation, with fitness r>1. All other individuals have fitness 1. During each step of the algorithm, an individual is chosen with probability proportional to its fitness, and its state (mutant or non-mutant) is passed on to an out-neighbour which is chosen u.a.r. If the underlying graph is strongly connected then the algorithm will eventually reach fixation, in which all individuals are mutants, or extinction, in which no individuals are mutants. An infinite family of directed graphs is said to be strongly amplifying if, for every r>1, the extinction probability tends to 0 as the number of vertices increases. Lieberman et al. proposed two potentially strongly-amplifying families - superstars and metafunnels. Heuristic arguments have been published, arguing that there are infinite families of superstars that are strongly amplifying. The same has been claimed for metafunnels. In this paper, we give the first rigorous proof that there is an infinite family of directed graphs that is strongly amplifying. We call the graphs in the family "megastars". When the algorithm is run on an n-vertex graph in this family, starting with a uniformly-chosen mutant, the extinction probability is roughly $n^{-1/2}$ (up to logarithmic factors). We prove that all infinite families of superstars and metafunnels have larger extinction probabilities (as a function of n). Finally, we prove that our analysis of megastars is fairly tight - there is no infinite family of megastars such that the Moran algorithm gives a smaller extinction probability (up to logarithmic factors).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Counting $4\times 4$ Matrix Partitions of Graphs

Given a symmetric matrix $M\in \{0,1,*\}^{D\times D}$, an $M$-partition of a graph $G$ is a function from $V(G)$ to $D$ such that no edge of $G$ is mapped to a $0$ of $M$ and no non-edge to a $1$. We give a computer-assisted proof that, when $|D|=4$, the problem of counting the $M$-partitions of an input graph is either in FP or is #P-complete. Tractability is proved by reduction to the related problem of counting list $M$-partitions; intractability is shown using a gadget construction and interpolation. We use a computer program to determine which of the two cases holds for all but a small number of matrices, which we resolve manually to establish the dichotomy. We conjecture that the dichotomy also holds for $|D|>4$. More specifically, we conjecture that, for any symmetric matrix $M\in\{0,1,*\}^{D\times D}$, the complexity of counting $M$-partitions is the same as the related problem of counting list $M$-partitions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Counting Homomorphisms to Square-Free Graphs, Modulo 2

We study the problem HomsTo$H$ of counting, modulo 2, the homomorphisms from an input graph to a fixed undirected graph $H$. A characteristic feature of modular counting is that cancellations make wider classes of instances tractable than is the case for exact (non-modular) counting, so subtle dichotomy theorems can arise. We show the following dichotomy: for any $H$ that contains no 4-cycles, HomsTo$H$ is either in polynomial time or is $\oplus P$-complete. This confirms a conjecture of Faben and Jerrum that was previously only known to hold for trees and for a restricted class of treewidth-2 graphs called cactus graphs. We confirm the conjecture for a rich class of graphs including graphs of unbounded treewidth. In particular, we focus on square-free graphs, which are graphs without 4-cycles. These graphs arise frequently in combinatorics, for example in connection with the strong perfect graph theorem and in certain graph algorithms. Previous dichotomy theorems required the graph to be tree-like so that tree-like decompositions could be exploited in the proof. We prove the conjecture for a much richer class of graphs by adopting a much more general approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Counting list matrix partitions of graphs

Given a symmetric D*D matrix M over {0,1,*}, a list M-partition of a graph G is a partition of G's vertices into D parts associated with the rows of M. The part of each vertex is chosen from a given list so that no edge of G maps to a 0 in M and no non-edge of G maps to a 1 in M. Many important graph-theoretic structures can be represented as list M-partitions, such as graph colourings, split graphs and homogeneous sets and pairs, which arise in the proofs of the weak and strong perfect graph conjectures. There has been quite a bit of work on determining for which matrices M computations involving list M-partitions are tractable. We focus on counting list M-partitions, given a graph G and a list for each vertex of G. We identify a set of "tractable" matrices and give an algorithm that counts list M-partitions in polynomial time for every (fixed) matrix M in this set. The algorithm uses data structures such as sparse-dense partitions and subcube decompositions to reduce each instance to a sequence of instances in which the lists restrict access to portions of M in which the interaction of 0s and 1s is controlled. We solve the resulting restricted instances by converting them into counting constraint satisfaction problems (#CSPs) which we solve using arc-consistency. For every matrix M for which our algorithm fails, we show that counting list M-partitions is #P-complete. Further, we give an explicit characterisation of the dichotomy theorem: counting list M-partitions is in FP if M has a structure called a derectangularising sequence; otherwise, counting list M-partitions is #P-hard. We show that the meta-problem of determining whether a given matrix has a derectangularising sequence is NP-complete. Finally, we show that lists can be used to encode cardinality restrictions in M-partitions problems and use this to give a polynomial-time algorithm for counting homogeneous pairs in graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Absorption Time of the Moran Process

The Moran process models the spread of mutations in populations on graphs. We investigate the absorption time of the process, which is the time taken for a mutation introduced at a randomly chosen vertex to either spread to the whole population, or to become extinct. It is known that the expected absorption time for an advantageous mutation is O(n^4) on an n-vertex undirected graph, which allows the behaviour of the process on undirected graphs to be analysed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method. We show that this does not extend to directed graphs by exhibiting an infinite family of directed graphs for which the expected absorption time is exponential in the number of vertices. However, for regular directed graphs, we show that the expected absorption time is Omega(n log n) and O(n^2). We exhibit families of graphs matching these bounds and give improved bounds for other families of graphs, based on isoperimetric number. Our results are obtained via stochastic dominations which we demonstrate by establishing a coupling in a related continuous-time model. The coupling also implies several natural domination results regarding the fixation probability of the original (discrete-time) process, resolving a conjecture of Shakarian, Roos and Johnson.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Approximating Fixation Probabilities in the Generalized Moran Process

We consider the Moran process, as generalized by Lieberman, Hauert and Nowak (Nature, 433:312--316, 2005). A population resides on the vertices of a finite, connected, undirected graph and, at each time step, an individual is chosen at random with probability proportional to its assigned 'fitness' value. It reproduces, placing a copy of itself on a neighbouring vertex chosen uniformly at random, replacing the individual that was there. The initial population consists of a single mutant of fitness $r>0$ placed uniformly at random, with every other vertex occupied by an individual of fitness 1. The main quantities of interest are the probabilities that the descendants of the initial mutant come to occupy the whole graph (fixation) and that they die out (extinction); almost surely, these are the only possibilities. In general, exact computation of these quantities by standard Markov chain techniques requires solving a system of linear equations of size exponential in the order of the graph so is not feasible. We show that, with high probability, the number of steps needed to reach fixation or extinction is bounded by a polynomial in the number of vertices in the graph. This bound allows us to construct fully polynomial randomized approximation schemes (FPRAS) for the probability of fixation (when $r\geq 1$) and of extinction (for all $r>0$).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The complexity of approximating conservative counting CSPs

We study the complexity of approximately solving the weighted counting constraint satisfaction problem #CSP(F). In the conservative case, where F contains all unary functions, there is a classification known for the case in which the domain of functions in F is Boolean. In this paper, we give a classification for the more general problem where functions in F have an arbitrary finite domain. We define the notions of weak log-modularity and weak log-supermodularity. We show that if F is weakly log-modular, then #CSP(F)is in FP. Otherwise, it is at least as difficult to approximate as #BIS, the problem of counting independent sets in bipartite graphs. #BIS is complete with respect to approximation-preserving reductions for a logically-defined complexity class #RHPi1, and is believed to be intractable. We further sub-divide the #BIS-hard case. If F is weakly log-supermodular, then we show that #CSP(F) is as easy as a (Boolean) log-supermodular weighted #CSP. Otherwise, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate. Finally, we give a full trichotomy for the arity-2 case, where #CSP(F) is in FP, or is #BIS-equivalent, or is equivalent in difficulty to #SAT, the problem of approximately counting the satisfying assignments of a Boolean formula in conjunctive normal form. We also discuss the algorithmic aspects of our classification.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The Complexity of Counting Homomorphisms to Cactus Graphs Modulo 2

A homomorphism from a graph G to a graph H is a function from V(G) to V(H) that preserves edges. Many combinatorial structures that arise in mathematics and computer science can be represented naturally as graph homomorphisms and as weighted sums of graph homomorphisms. In this paper, we study the complexity of counting homomorphisms modulo 2. The complexity of modular counting was introduced by Papadimitriou and Zachos and it has been pioneered by Valiant who famously introduced a problem for which counting modulo 7 is easy but counting modulo 2 is intractable. Modular counting provides a rich setting in which to study the structure of homomorphism problems. In this case, the structure of the graph H has a big influence on the complexity of the problem. Thus, our approach is graph-theoretic. We give a complete solution for the class of cactus graphs, which are connected graphs in which every edge belongs to at most one cycle. Cactus graphs arise in many applications such as the modelling of wireless sensor networks and the comparison of genomes. We show that, for some cactus graphs H, counting homomorphisms to H modulo 2 can be done in polynomial time. For every other fixed cactus graph H, the problem is complete for the complexity class parity-P which is a wide complexity class to which every problem in the polynomial hierarchy can be reduced (using randomised reductions). Determining which H lead to tractable problems can be done in polynomial time. Our result builds upon the work of Faben and Jerrum, who gave a dichotomy for the case in which H is a tree.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

On the Fixation Probability of Superstars

The Moran process models the spread of genetic mutations through a population. A mutant with relative fitness $r$ is introduced into a population and the system evolves, either reaching fixation (in which every individual is a mutant) or extinction (in which none is). In a widely cited paper (Nature, 2005), Lieberman, Hauert and Nowak generalize the model to populations on the vertices of graphs. They describe a class of graphs (called "superstars"), with a parameter $k$. Superstars are designed to have an increasing fixation probability as $k$ increases. They state that the probability of fixation tends to $1-r^{-k}$ as graphs get larger but we show that this claim is untrue as stated. Specifically, for $k=5$, we show that the true fixation probability (in the limit, as graphs get larger) is at most $1-1/j(r)$ where $j(r)=Θ(r^4)$, contrary to the claimed result. We do believe that the qualitative claim of Lieberman et al.\ --- that the fixation probability of superstars tends to 1 as $k$ increases --- is correct, and that it can probably be proved along the lines of their sketch. We were able to run larger computer simulations than the ones presented in their paper. However, simulations on graphs of around 40,000 vertices do not support their claim. Perhaps these graphs are too small to exhibit the limiting behaviour.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

An Effective Dichotomy for the Counting Constraint Satisfaction Problem

Bulatov (2008) gave a dichotomy for the counting constraint satisfaction problem #CSP. A problem from #CSP is characterised by a constraint language, which is a fixed, finite set of relations over a finite domain D. An instance of the problem uses these relations to constrain the variables in a larger set. Bulatov showed that the problem of counting the satisfying assignments of instances of any problem from #CSP is either in polynomial time (FP) or is #P-complete. His proof draws heavily on techniques from universal algebra and cannot be understood without a secure grasp of that field. We give an elementary proof of Bulatov's dichotomy, based on succinct representations, which we call frames, of a class of highly structured relations, which we call strongly rectangular. We show that these are precisely the relations which are invariant under a Mal'tsev polymorphism. En route, we give a simplification of a decision algorithm for strongly rectangular constraint languages, due to Bulatov and Dalmau (2006). We establish a new criterion for the #CSP dichotomy, which we call strong balance, and we prove that this property is decidable. In fact, we establish membership in NP. Thus, we show that the dichotomy is effective, resolving the most important open question concerning the #CSP dichotomy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The Complexity of Approximating Bounded-Degree Boolean \sharp CSP

The degree of a CSP instance is the maximum number of times that any variable appears in the scopes of constraints. We consider the approximate counting problem for Boolean CSP with bounded-degree instances, for constraint languages containing the two unary constant relations {0} and {1}. When the maximum allowed degree is large enough (at least 6) we obtain a complete classification of the complexity of this problem. It is exactly solvable in polynomial-time if every relation in the constraint language is affine. It is equivalent to the problem of approximately counting independent sets in bipartite graphs if every relation can be expressed as conjunctions of {0}, {1} and binary implication. Otherwise, there is no FPRAS unless NP=RP. For lower degree bounds, additional cases arise, where the complexity is related to the complexity of approximately counting independent sets in hypergraphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

The Complexity of Approximating Bounded-Degree Boolean #CSP (Extended Abstract)

The degree of a CSP instance is the maximum number of times that a variable may appear in the scope of constraints. We consider the approximate counting problem for Boolean CSPs with bounded-degree instances, for constraint languages containing the two unary constant relations {0} and {1}. When the maximum degree is at least 25 we obtain a complete classification of the complexity of this problem. It is exactly solvable in polynomial-time if every relation in the constraint language is affine. It is equivalent to the problem of approximately counting independent sets in bipartite graphs if every relation can be expressed as conjunctions of {0}, {1} and binary implication. Otherwise, there is no FPRAS unless NP=RP. For lower degree bounds, additional cases arise in which the complexity is related to the complexity of approximately counting independent sets in hypergraphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access