BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Martin Dyer

Martin Dyer appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational ComplexityDiscrete Mathematicsmath.COComputer Science and Game Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

14works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

14 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A dichotomy for bounded degree graph homomorphisms with nonnegative weights

We consider the complexity of counting weighted graph homomorphisms defined by a symmetric matrix $A$. Each symmetric matrix $A$ defines a graph homomorphism function $Z_A(\cdot)$, also known as the partition function. Dyer and Greenhill [10] established a complexity dichotomy of $Z_A(\cdot)$ for symmetric $\{0, 1\}$-matrices $A$, and they further proved that its #P-hardness part also holds for bounded degree graphs. Bulatov and Grohe [4] extended the Dyer-Greenhill dichotomy to nonnegative symmetric matrices $A$. However, their hardness proof requires graphs of arbitrarily large degree, and whether the bounded degree part of the Dyer-Greenhill dichotomy can be extended has been an open problem for 15 years. We resolve this open problem and prove that for nonnegative symmetric $A$, either $Z_A(G)$ is in polynomial time for all graphs $G$, or it is #P-hard for bounded degree (and simple) graphs $G$. We further extend the complexity dichotomy to include nonnegative vertex weights. Additionally, we prove that the #P-hardness part of the dichotomy by Goldberg et al. [12] for $Z_A(\cdot)$ also holds for simple graphs, where $A$ is any real symmetric matrix.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Counting $4\times 4$ Matrix Partitions of Graphs

Given a symmetric matrix $M\in \{0,1,*\}^{D\times D}$, an $M$-partition of a graph $G$ is a function from $V(G)$ to $D$ such that no edge of $G$ is mapped to a $0$ of $M$ and no non-edge to a $1$. We give a computer-assisted proof that, when $|D|=4$, the problem of counting the $M$-partitions of an input graph is either in FP or is #P-complete. Tractability is proved by reduction to the related problem of counting list $M$-partitions; intractability is shown using a gadget construction and interpolation. We use a computer program to determine which of the two cases holds for all but a small number of matrices, which we resolve manually to establish the dichotomy. We conjecture that the dichotomy also holds for $|D|>4$. More specifically, we conjecture that, for any symmetric matrix $M\in\{0,1,*\}^{D\times D}$, the complexity of counting $M$-partitions is the same as the related problem of counting list $M$-partitions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Discordant voting processes on finite graphs

We consider an asynchronous voting process on graphs which we call discordant voting, and which can be described as follows. Initially each vertex holds one of two opinions, red or blue say. Neighbouring vertices with different opinions interact pairwise. After an interaction both vertices have the same colour. The quantity of interest is T, the time to reach consensus , i.e. the number of interactions needed for all vertices have the same colour. An edge whose endpoint colours differ (i.e. one vertex is coloured red and the other one blue) is said to be discordant. A vertex is discordant if its is incident with a discordant edge. In discordant voting, all interactions are based on discordant edges. Because the voting process is asynchronous there are several ways to update the colours of the interacting vertices. Push: Pick a random discordant vertex and push its colour to a random discordant neighbour. Pull: Pick a random discordant vertex and pull the colour of a random discordant neighbour. Oblivious: Pick a random endpoint of a random discordant edge and push the colour to the other end point. We show that E(T), the expected time to reach consensus, depends strongly on the underlying graph and the update rule. For connected graphs on n vertices, and an initial half red, half blue colouring the following hold. For oblivious voting, E(T) =n^2/4 independent of the underlying graph. For the complete graph K_n, the push protocol has E(T)= Theta(n log(n)), whereas the pull protocol has E(T)= Theta(2^n). For the cycle C_n all three protocols have E(T) = Theta(n^2). For the star graph however, the pull protocol has E(T)=O(n^2), whereas the push protocol is slower with E(T) = Theta(n^2 log(n)). The wide variation in E(T) for the pull protocol is to be contrasted with the well known model of synchronous pull voting, for which E(T) = O(n) on many classes of expanders.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On the chromatic number of a random hypergraph

We consider the problem of $k$-colouring a random $r$-uniform hypergraph with $n$ vertices and $cn$ edges, where $k$, $r$, $c$ remain constant as $n$ tends to infinity. Achlioptas and Naor showed that the chromatic number of a random graph in this setting, the case $r=2$, must have one of two easily computable values as $n$ tends to infinity. We give a complete generalisation of this result to random uniform hypergraphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Structure and eigenvalues of heat-bath Markov chains

We prove that heat-bath chains (which we define in a general setting) have no negative eigenvalues. Two applications of this result are presented: one to single-site heat-bath chains for spin systems and one to a heat-bath Markov chain for sampling contingency tables. Some implications of our main result for the analysis of the mixing time of heat-bath Markov chains are discussed. We also prove an alternative characterisation of heat-bath chains, and consider possible generalisations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The complexity of approximating conservative counting CSPs

We study the complexity of approximately solving the weighted counting constraint satisfaction problem #CSP(F). In the conservative case, where F contains all unary functions, there is a classification known for the case in which the domain of functions in F is Boolean. In this paper, we give a classification for the more general problem where functions in F have an arbitrary finite domain. We define the notions of weak log-modularity and weak log-supermodularity. We show that if F is weakly log-modular, then #CSP(F)is in FP. Otherwise, it is at least as difficult to approximate as #BIS, the problem of counting independent sets in bipartite graphs. #BIS is complete with respect to approximation-preserving reductions for a logically-defined complexity class #RHPi1, and is believed to be intractable. We further sub-divide the #BIS-hard case. If F is weakly log-supermodular, then we show that #CSP(F) is as easy as a (Boolean) log-supermodular weighted #CSP. Otherwise, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate. Finally, we give a full trichotomy for the arity-2 case, where #CSP(F) is in FP, or is #BIS-equivalent, or is equivalent in difficulty to #SAT, the problem of approximately counting the satisfying assignments of a Boolean formula in conjunctive normal form. We also discuss the algorithmic aspects of our classification.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The expressibility of functions on the Boolean domain, with applications to Counting CSPs

An important tool in the study of the complexity of Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) is the notion of a relational clone, which is the set of all relations expressible using primitive positive formulas over a particular set of base relations. Post's lattice gives a complete classification of all Boolean relational clones, and this has been used to classify the computational difficulty of CSPs. Motivated by a desire to understand the computational complexity of (weighted) counting CSPs, we develop an analogous notion of functional clones and study the landscape of these clones. One of these clones is the collection of log-supermodular (lsm) functions, which turns out to play a significant role in classifying counting CSPs. In the conservative case (where all nonnegative unary functions are available), we show that there are no functional clones lying strictly between the clone of lsm functions and the total clone (containing all functions). Thus, any counting CSP that contains a single nontrivial non-lsm function is computationally as hard to approximate as any problem in #P. Furthermore, we show that any non-trivial functional clone (in a sense that will be made precise) contains the binary function "implies". As a consequence, in the conservative case, all non-trivial counting CSPs are as hard as #BIS, the problem of counting independent sets in a bipartite graph. Given the complexity-theoretic results, it is natural to ask whether the "implies" clone is equivalent to the clone of lsm functions. We use the Mobius transform and the Fourier transform to show that these clones coincide precisely up to arity 3. It is an intriguing open question whether the lsm clone is finitely generated. Finally, we investigate functional clones in which only restricted classes of unary functions are available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

An Effective Dichotomy for the Counting Constraint Satisfaction Problem

Bulatov (2008) gave a dichotomy for the counting constraint satisfaction problem #CSP. A problem from #CSP is characterised by a constraint language, which is a fixed, finite set of relations over a finite domain D. An instance of the problem uses these relations to constrain the variables in a larger set. Bulatov showed that the problem of counting the satisfying assignments of instances of any problem from #CSP is either in polynomial time (FP) or is #P-complete. His proof draws heavily on techniques from universal algebra and cannot be understood without a secure grasp of that field. We give an elementary proof of Bulatov's dichotomy, based on succinct representations, which we call frames, of a class of highly structured relations, which we call strongly rectangular. We show that these are precisely the relations which are invariant under a Mal'tsev polymorphism. En route, we give a simplification of a decision algorithm for strongly rectangular constraint languages, due to Bulatov and Dalmau (2006). We establish a new criterion for the #CSP dichotomy, which we call strong balance, and we prove that this property is decidable. In fact, we establish membership in NP. Thus, we show that the dichotomy is effective, resolving the most important open question concerning the #CSP dichotomy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On the Imitation Strategy for Games on Graphs

In evolutionary game theory, repeated two-player games are used to study strategy evolution in a population under natural selection. As the evolution greatly depends on the interaction structure, there has been growing interests in studying the games on graphs. In this setting, players occupy the vertices of a graph and play the game only with their immediate neighbours. Various evolutionary dynamics have been studied in this setting for different games. Due to the complexity of the analysis, however, most of the work in this area is experimental. This paper aims to contribute to a more complete understanding, by providing rigorous analysis. We study the imitation dynamics on two classes of graph: cycles and complete graphs. We focus on three well known social dilemmas, namely the Prisoner's Dilemma, the Stag Hunt and the Snowdrift Game. We also consider, for completeness, the so-called Harmony Game. Our analysis shows that, on the cycle, all four games converge fast, either to total cooperation or total defection. On the complete graph, all but the Snowdrift game converge fast, either to cooperation or defection. The Snowdrift game reaches a metastable state fast, where cooperators and defectors coexist. It will converge to cooperation or defection only after spending time in this state which is exponential in the size, n, of the graph. In exceptional cases, it will remain in this state indefinitely. Our theoretical results are supported by experimental investigations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The Complexity of Approximating Bounded-Degree Boolean \sharp CSP

The degree of a CSP instance is the maximum number of times that any variable appears in the scopes of constraints. We consider the approximate counting problem for Boolean CSP with bounded-degree instances, for constraint languages containing the two unary constant relations {0} and {1}. When the maximum allowed degree is large enough (at least 6) we obtain a complete classification of the complexity of this problem. It is exactly solvable in polynomial-time if every relation in the constraint language is affine. It is equivalent to the problem of approximately counting independent sets in bipartite graphs if every relation can be expressed as conjunctions of {0}, {1} and binary implication. Otherwise, there is no FPRAS unless NP=RP. For lower degree bounds, additional cases arise, where the complexity is related to the complexity of approximately counting independent sets in hypergraphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma on a Cycle

Pavlov, a well-known strategy in game theory, has been shown to have some advantages in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD) game. However, this strategy can be exploited by inveterate defectors. We modify this strategy to mitigate the exploitation. We call the resulting strategy Rational Pavlov. This has a parameter p which measures the "degree of forgiveness" of the players. We study the evolution of cooperation in the IPD game, when n players are arranged in a cycle, and all play this strategy. We examine the effect of varying p on the convergence rate and prove that the convergence rate is fast, O(n log n) time, for high values of p. We also prove that the convergence rate is exponentially slow in n for small enough p. Our analysis leaves a gap in the range of p, but simulations suggest that there is, in fact, a sharp phase transition.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A complexity dichotomy for hypergraph partition functions

We consider the complexity of counting homomorphisms from an $r$-uniform hypergraph $G$ to a symmetric $r$-ary relation $H$. We give a dichotomy theorem for $r>2$, showing for which $H$ this problem is in FP and for which $H$ it is #P-complete. This generalises a theorem of Dyer and Greenhill (2000) for the case $r=2$, which corresponds to counting graph homomorphisms. Our dichotomy theorem extends to the case in which the relation $H$ is weighted, and the goal is to compute the \emph{partition function}, which is the sum of weights of the homomorphisms. This problem is motivated by statistical physics, where it arises as computing the partition function for particle models in which certain combinations of $r$ sites interact symmetrically. In the weighted case, our dichotomy theorem generalises a result of Bulatov and Grohe (2005) for graphs, where $r=2$. When $r=2$, the polynomial time cases of the dichotomy correspond simply to rank-1 weights. Surprisingly, for all $r>2$ the polynomial time cases of the dichotomy have rather more structure. It turns out that the weights must be superimposed on a combinatorial structure defined by solutions of an equation over an Abelian group. Our result also gives a dichotomy for a closely related constraint satisfaction problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access