BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Bingqian Lu

Bingqian Lu appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingHardware Architecture

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Semi-Decoupled Approach to Fast and Optimal Hardware-Software Co-Design of Neural Accelerators

In view of the performance limitations of fully-decoupled designs for neural architectures and accelerators, hardware-software co-design has been emerging to fully reap the benefits of flexible design spaces and optimize neural network performance. Nonetheless, such co-design also enlarges the total search space to practically infinity and presents substantial challenges. While the prior studies have been focusing on improving the search efficiency (e.g., via reinforcement learning), they commonly rely on co-searches over the entire architecture-accelerator design space. In this paper, we propose a \emph{semi}-decoupled approach to reduce the size of the total design space by orders of magnitude, yet without losing optimality. We first perform neural architecture search to obtain a small set of optimal architectures for one accelerator candidate. Importantly, this is also the set of (close-to-)optimal architectures for other accelerator designs based on the property that neural architectures' ranking orders in terms of inference latency and energy consumption on different accelerator designs are highly similar. Then, instead of considering all the possible architectures, we optimize the accelerator design only in combination with this small set of architectures, thus significantly reducing the total search cost. We validate our approach by conducting experiments on various architecture spaces for accelerator designs with different dataflows. Our results highlight that we can obtain the optimal design by only navigating over the reduced search space. The source code of this work is at \url{https://github.com/Ren-Research/CoDesign}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Note on Latency Variability of Deep Neural Networks for Mobile Inference

Running deep neural network (DNN) inference on mobile devices, i.e., mobile inference, has become a growing trend, making inference less dependent on network connections and keeping private data locally. The prior studies on optimizing DNNs for mobile inference typically focus on the metric of average inference latency, thus implicitly assuming that mobile inference exhibits little latency variability. In this note, we conduct a preliminary measurement study on the latency variability of DNNs for mobile inference. We show that the inference latency variability can become quite significant in the presence of CPU resource contention. More interestingly, unlike the common belief that the relative performance superiority of DNNs on one device can carry over to another device and/or another level of resource contention, we highlight that a DNN model with a better latency performance than another model can become outperformed by the other model when resource contention be more severe or running on another device. Thus, when optimizing DNN models for mobile inference, only measuring the average latency may not be adequate; instead, latency variability under various conditions should be accounted for, including but not limited to different devices and different levels of CPU resource contention considered in this note.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Scaling Up Deep Neural Network Optimization for Edge Inference

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been increasingly deployed on and integrated with edge devices, such as mobile phones, drones, robots and wearables. To run DNN inference directly on edge devices (a.k.a. edge inference) with a satisfactory performance, optimizing the DNN design (e.g., network architecture and quantization policy) is crucial. While state-of-the-art DNN designs have leveraged performance predictors to speed up the optimization process, they are device-specific (i.e., each predictor for only one target device) and hence cannot scale well in the presence of extremely diverse edge devices. Moreover, even with performance predictors, the optimizer (e.g., search-based optimization) can still be time-consuming when optimizing DNNs for many different devices. In this work, we propose two approaches to scaling up DNN optimization. In the first approach, we reuse the performance predictors built on a proxy device, and leverage the performance monotonicity to scale up the DNN optimization without re-building performance predictors for each different device. In the second approach, we build scalable performance predictors that can estimate the resulting performance (e.g., inference accuracy/latency/energy) given a DNN-device pair, and use a neural network-based automated optimizer that takes both device features and optimization parameters as input and then directly outputs the optimal DNN design without going through a lengthy optimization process for each individual device.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access