BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Benjamin Doerr

Benjamin Doerr contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Neural and Evolutionary ComputingData Structures and AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningComputational GeometryDiscrete Mathematicsmath.NAmath.OCNumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
10works
0followers
9topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Improved Runtime Guarantees for the SPEA2 Multi-Objective Optimizer

Together with the NSGA-II, the SPEA2 is one of the most widely used domination-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. For both algorithms, the known runtime guarantees are linear in the population size; for the NSGA-II, matching lower bounds exist. With a careful study of the more complex selection mechanism of the SPEA2, we show that it has very different population dynamics. From these, we prove runtime guarantees for the OneMinMax, LeadingOnesTrailingZeros, and OneJumpZeroJump benchmarks that depend less on the population size. For example, we show that the SPEA2 with parent population size $μ\ge n - 2k + 3$ and offspring population size $λ$ computes the Pareto front of the OneJumpZeroJump benchmark with gap size $k$ in an expected number of $O( (λ+μ)n + n^{k+1})$ function evaluations. This shows that the best runtime guarantee of $O(n^{k+1})$ is not only achieved for $μ= Θ(n)$ and $λ= O(n)$ but for arbitrary $μ, λ= O(n^k)$. Thus, choosing suitable parameters -- a key challenge in using heuristic algorithms -- is much easier for the SPEA2 than the NSGA-II.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Position: Don't be Afraid of Over-Smoothing And Over-Squashing

Over-smoothing and over-squashing have been extensively studied in the literature on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) over the past years. We challenge this prevailing focus in GNN research, arguing that these phenomena are less critical for practical applications than assumed. We suggest that performance decreases often stem from uninformative receptive fields rather than over-smoothing. We support this position with extensive experiments on several standard benchmark datasets, demonstrating that accuracy and over-smoothing are mostly uncorrelated and that optimal model depths remain small even with mitigation techniques, thus highlighting the negligible role of over-smoothing. Similarly, we challenge that over-squashing is always detrimental in practical applications. Instead, we posit that the distribution of relevant information over the graph frequently factorises and is often localised within a small k-hop neighbourhood, questioning the necessity of jointly observing entire receptive fields or engaging in an extensive search for long-range interactions. The results of our experiments show that architectural interventions designed to mitigate over-squashing fail to yield significant performance gains. This position paper advocates for a paradigm shift in theoretical research, urging a diligent analysis of learning tasks and datasets using statistics that measure the underlying distribution of label-relevant information to better understand their localisation and factorisation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2024arXiv

A First Runtime Analysis of the NSGA-II on a Multimodal Problem

Very recently, the first mathematical runtime analyses of the multi-objective evolutionary optimizer NSGA-II have been conducted. We continue this line of research with a first runtime analysis of this algorithm on a benchmark problem consisting of two multimodal objectives. We prove that if the population size $N$ is at least four times the size of the Pareto front, then the NSGA-II with four different ways to select parents and bit-wise mutation optimizes the OneJumpZeroJump benchmark with jump size~$2 \le k \le n/4$ in time $O(N n^k)$. When using fast mutation, a recently proposed heavy-tailed mutation operator, this guarantee improves by a factor of $k^{Ω(k)}$. Overall, this work shows that the NSGA-II copes with the local optima of the OneJumpZeroJump problem at least as well as the global SEMO algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Rigorous Runtime Analysis of the $(1 + (λ, λ))$ GA on Jump Functions

The $(1 + (λ,λ))$ genetic algorithm is a younger evolutionary algorithm trying to profit also from inferior solutions. Rigorous runtime analyses on unimodal fitness functions showed that it can indeed be faster than classical evolutionary algorithms, though on these simple problems the gains were only moderate. In this work, we conduct the first runtime analysis of this algorithm on a multimodal problem class, the jump functions benchmark. We show that with the right parameters, the \ollga optimizes any jump function with jump size $2 \le k \le n/4$ in expected time $O(n^{(k+1)/2} e^{O(k)} k^{-k/2})$, which significantly and already for constant~$k$ outperforms standard mutation-based algorithms with their $Θ(n^k)$ runtime and standard crossover-based algorithms with their $\tilde{O}(n^{k-1})$ runtime guarantee. For the isolated problem of leaving the local optimum of jump functions, we determine provably optimal parameters that lead to a runtime of $(n/k)^{k/2} e^{Θ(k)}$. This suggests some general advice on how to set the parameters of the \ollga, which might ease the further use of this algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Sharp Discrepancy Bound for Jittered Sampling

For $m, d \in {\mathbb N}$, a jittered sampling point set $P$ having $N = m^d$ points in $[0,1)^d$ is constructed by partitioning the unit cube $[0,1)^d$ into $m^d$ axis-aligned cubes of equal size and then placing one point independently and uniformly at random in each cube. We show that there are constants $c \ge 0$ and $C$ such that for all $d$ and all $m \ge d$ the expected non-normalized star discrepancy of a jittered sampling point set satisfies \[c \,dm^{\frac{d-1}{2}} \sqrt{1 + \log(\tfrac md)} \le {\mathbb E} D^*(P) \le C\, dm^{\frac{d-1}{2}} \sqrt{1 + \log(\tfrac md)}.\] This discrepancy is thus smaller by a factor of $Θ\big(\sqrt{\frac{1+\log(m/d)}{m/d}}\,\big)$ than the one of a uniformly distributed random point set of $m^d$ points. This result improves both the upper and the lower bound for the discrepancy of jittered sampling given by Pausinger and Steinerberger (Journal of Complexity (2016)). It also removes the asymptotic requirement that $m$ is sufficiently large compared to $d$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Does Comma Selection Help To Cope With Local Optima

One hope when using non-elitism in evolutionary computation is that the ability to abandon the current-best solution aids leaving local optima. To improve our understanding of this mechanism, we perform a rigorous runtime analysis of a basic non-elitist evolutionary algorithm (EA), the $(μ,λ)$ EA, on the most basic benchmark function with a local optimum, the jump function. We prove that for all reasonable values of the parameters and the problem, the expected runtime of the $(μ,λ)$~EA is, apart from lower order terms, at least as large as the expected runtime of its elitist counterpart, the $(μ+λ)$~EA (for which we conduct the first runtime analysis on jump functions to allow this comparison). Consequently, the ability of the $(μ,λ)$~EA to leave local optima to inferior solutions does not lead to a runtime advantage. We complement this lower bound with an upper bound that, for broad ranges of the parameters, is identical to our lower bound apart from lower order terms. This is the first runtime result for a non-elitist algorithm on a multi-modal problem that is tight apart from lower order terms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Fixed-Target Runtime Analysis

Runtime analysis aims at contributing to our understanding of evolutionary algorithms through mathematical analyses of their runtimes. In the context of discrete optimization problems, runtime analysis classically studies the time needed to find an optimal solution. However, both from a practical and from a theoretical viewpoint, more fine-grained performance measures are needed to gain a more detailed understanding of the main working principles and their resulting performance implications. Two complementary approaches have been suggested: fixed-budget analyses and fixed-target analyses. In this work, we conduct an in-depth study on the advantages and the limitations of fixed-target analyses. We show that, different from fixed-budget analyses, many classical methods from the runtime analysis of discrete evolutionary algorithms yield fixed-target results without greater effort. We use this to conduct a number of new fixed-target analyses. However, we also point out examples where an extension of existing runtime results to fixed-target results is highly non-trivial.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Simplified Run Time Analysis of the Univariate Marginal Distribution Algorithm on LeadingOnes

With elementary means, we prove a stronger run time guarantee for the univariate marginal distribution algorithm (UMDA) optimizing the LeadingOnes benchmark function in the desirable regime with low genetic drift. If the population size is at least quasilinear, then, with high probability, the UMDA samples the optimum within a number of iterations that is linear in the problem size divided by the logarithm of the UMDA's selection rate. This improves over the previous guarantee, obtained by Dang and Lehre (2015) via the deep level-based population method, both in terms of the run time and by demonstrating further run time gains from small selection rates. With similar arguments as in our upper-bound analysis, we also obtain the first lower bound for this problem. Under similar assumptions, we prove that a bound that matches our upper bound up to constant factors holds with high probability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Runtime Analysis of a Heavy-Tailed $(1+(λ,λ))$ Genetic Algorithm on Jump Functions

It was recently observed that the $(1+(λ,λ))$ genetic algorithm can comparably easily escape the local optimum of the jump functions benchmark. Consequently, this algorithm can optimize the jump function with jump size $k$ in an expected runtime of only $n^{(k + 1)/2}k^{-k/2}e^{O(k)}$ fitness evaluations (Antipov, Doerr, Karavaev (GECCO 2020)). To obtain this performance, however, a non-standard parameter setting depending on the jump size $k$ was used. To overcome this difficulty, we propose to choose two parameters of the $(1+(λ,λ))$ genetic algorithm randomly from a power-law distribution. Via a mathematical runtime analysis, we show that this algorithm with natural instance-independent choices of the distribution parameters on all jump functions with jump size at most $n/4$ has a performance close to what the best instance-specific parameters in the previous work obtained. This price for instance-independence can be made as small as an $O(n\log(n))$ factor. Given the difficulty of the jump problem and the runtime losses from using mildly suboptimal fixed parameters (also discussed in this work), this appears to be a fair price.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Univariate Marginal Distribution Algorithm Copes Well With Deception and Epistasis

In their recent work, Lehre and Nguyen (FOGA 2019) show that the univariate marginal distribution algorithm (UMDA) needs time exponential in the parent populations size to optimize the DeceptiveLeadingBlocks (DLB) problem. They conclude from this result that univariate EDAs have difficulties with deception and epistasis. In this work, we show that this negative finding is caused by an unfortunate choice of the parameters of the UMDA. When the population sizes are chosen large enough to prevent genetic drift, then the UMDA optimizes the DLB problem with high probability with at most $λ(\frac{n}{2} + 2 e \ln n)$ fitness evaluations. Since an offspring population size $λ$ of order $n \log n$ can prevent genetic drift, the UMDA can solve the DLB problem with $O(n^2 \log n)$ fitness evaluations. In contrast, for classic evolutionary algorithms no better run time guarantee than $O(n^3)$ is known (which we prove to be tight for the ${(1+1)}$ EA), so our result rather suggests that the UMDA can cope well with deception and epistatis. From a broader perspective, our result shows that the UMDA can cope better with local optima than evolutionary algorithms; such a result was previously known only for the compact genetic algorithm. Together with the lower bound of Lehre and Nguyen, our result for the first time rigorously proves that running EDAs in the regime with genetic drift can lead to drastic performance losses.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access