Paper detail

A Tight Runtime Analysis of the $(1+(λ, λ))$ Genetic Algorithm on OneMax

Understanding how crossover works is still one of the big challenges in evolutionary computation research, and making our understanding precise and proven by mathematical means might be an even bigger one. As one of few examples where crossover provably is useful, the $(1+(λ, λ))$ Genetic Algorithm (GA) was proposed recently in [Doerr, Doerr, Ebel: TCS 2015]. Using the fitness level method, the expected optimization time on general OneMax functions was analyzed and a $O(\max\{n\log(n)/λ, λn\})$ bound was proven for any offspring population size $λ\in [1..n]$. We improve this work in several ways, leading to sharper bounds and a better understanding of how the use of crossover speeds up the runtime in this algorithm. We first improve the upper bound on the runtime to $O(\max\{n\log(n)/λ, nλ\log\log(λ)/\log(λ)\})$. This improvement is made possible from observing that in the parallel generation of $λ$ offspring via crossover (but not mutation), the best of these often is better than the expected value, and hence several fitness levels can be gained in one iteration. We then present the first lower bound for this problem. It matches our upper bound for all values of $λ$. This allows to determine the asymptotically optimal value for the population size. It is $λ= Θ(\sqrt{\log(n)\log\log(n)/\log\log\log(n)})$, which gives an optimization time of $Θ(n \sqrt{\log(n)\log\log\log(n)/\log\log(n)})$. Hence the improved runtime analysis gives a better runtime guarantee along with a better suggestion for the parameter $λ$. We finally give a tail bound for the upper tail of the runtime distribution, which shows that the actual runtime exceeds our runtime guarantee by a factor of $(1+δ)$ with probability $O((n/λ^2)^{-δ})$ only.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.