Paper detail

Most binary matrices have no small defining set

Consider a matrix $M$ chosen uniformly at random from a class of $m \times n$ matrices of zeros and ones with prescribed row and column sums. A partially filled matrix $D$ is a $\mathit{defining}$ $\mathit{set}$ for $M$ if $M$ is the unique member of its class that contains the entries in $D$. The $\mathit{size}$ of a defining set is the number of filled entries. A $\mathit{critical}$ $\mathit{set}$ is a defining set for which the removal of any entry stops it being a defining set. For some small fixed $ε>0$, we assume that $n\le m=o(n^{1+ε})$, and that $λ\le1/2$, where $λ$ is the proportion of entries of $M$ that equal $1$. We also assume that the row sums of $M$ do not vary by more than $\mathcal{O}(n^{1/2+ε})$, and that the column sums do not vary by more than $\mathcal{O}(m^{1/2+ε})$. Under these assumptions we show that $M$ almost surely has no defining set of size less than $λmn-\mathcal{O}(m^{7/4+ε})$. It follows that $M$ almost surely has no critical set of size more than $(1-λ)mn+\mathcal{O}(m^{7/4+ε})$. Our results generalise a theorem of Cavenagh and Ramadurai, who examined the case when $λ=1/2$ and $n=m=2^k$ for an integer $k$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.