BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Andrei Graur

Andrei Graur contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityDiscrete MathematicsDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computingmath.COmath.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Improved Lower Bounds for Submodular Function Minimization

We provide a generic technique for constructing families of submodular functions to obtain lower bounds for submodular function minimization (SFM). Applying this technique, we prove that any deterministic SFM algorithm on a ground set of $n$ elements requires at least $Ω(n \log n)$ queries to an evaluation oracle. This is the first super-linear query complexity lower bound for SFM and improves upon the previous best lower bound of $2n$ given by [Graur et al., ITCS 2020]. Using our construction, we also prove that any (possibly randomized) parallel SFM algorithm, which can make up to $\mathsf{poly}(n)$ queries per round, requires at least $Ω(n / \log n)$ rounds to minimize a submodular function. This improves upon the previous best lower bound of $\tildeΩ(n^{1/3})$ rounds due to [Chakrabarty et al., FOCS 2021], and settles the parallel complexity of query-efficient SFM up to logarithmic factors due to a recent advance in [Jiang, SODA 2021].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient Splitting of Measures and Necklaces

We provide approximation algorithms for two problems, known as NECKLACE SPLITTING and $ε$-CONSENSUS SPLITTING. In the problem $ε$-CONSENSUS SPLITTING, there are $n$ non-atomic probability measures on the interval $[0, 1]$ and $k$ agents. The goal is to divide the interval, via at most $n (k-1)$ cuts, into pieces and distribute them to the $k$ agents in an approximately equitable way, so that the discrepancy between the shares of any two agents, according to each measure, is at most $2 ε/ k$. It is known that this is possible even for $ε= 0$. NECKLACE SPLITTING is a discrete version of $ε$-CONSENSUS SPLITTING. For $k = 2$ and some absolute positive constant $ε$, both of these problems are PPAD-hard. We consider two types of approximation. The first provides every agent a positive amount of measure of each type under the constraint of making at most $n (k - 1)$ cuts. The second obtains an approximately equitable split with as few cuts as possible. Apart from the offline model, we consider the online model as well, where the interval (or necklace) is presented as a stream, and decisions about cutting and distributing must be made on the spot. For the first type of approximation, we describe an efficient algorithm that gives every agent at least $\frac{1}{nk}$ of each measure and works even online. For the second type of approximation, we provide an efficient online algorithm that makes $\text{poly}(n, k, ε)$ cuts and an offline algorithm making $O(nk \log \frac{k}ε)$ cuts. We also establish lower bounds for the number of cuts required in the online model for both problems even for $k=2$ agents, showing that the number of cuts in our online algorithm is optimal up to a logarithmic factor.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access