Paper detail

Efficient Splitting of Measures and Necklaces

We provide approximation algorithms for two problems, known as NECKLACE SPLITTING and $ε$-CONSENSUS SPLITTING. In the problem $ε$-CONSENSUS SPLITTING, there are $n$ non-atomic probability measures on the interval $[0, 1]$ and $k$ agents. The goal is to divide the interval, via at most $n (k-1)$ cuts, into pieces and distribute them to the $k$ agents in an approximately equitable way, so that the discrepancy between the shares of any two agents, according to each measure, is at most $2 ε/ k$. It is known that this is possible even for $ε= 0$. NECKLACE SPLITTING is a discrete version of $ε$-CONSENSUS SPLITTING. For $k = 2$ and some absolute positive constant $ε$, both of these problems are PPAD-hard. We consider two types of approximation. The first provides every agent a positive amount of measure of each type under the constraint of making at most $n (k - 1)$ cuts. The second obtains an approximately equitable split with as few cuts as possible. Apart from the offline model, we consider the online model as well, where the interval (or necklace) is presented as a stream, and decisions about cutting and distributing must be made on the spot. For the first type of approximation, we describe an efficient algorithm that gives every agent at least $\frac{1}{nk}$ of each measure and works even online. For the second type of approximation, we provide an efficient online algorithm that makes $\text{poly}(n, k, ε)$ cuts and an offline algorithm making $O(nk \log \frac{k}ε)$ cuts. We also establish lower bounds for the number of cuts required in the online model for both problems even for $k=2$ agents, showing that the number of cuts in our online algorithm is optimal up to a logarithmic factor.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.