Researcher profile

András Zempléni

András Zempléni contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

how well can sensitivity and sojourn time be estimated

Chronic disease progression models are governed by three main parameters: sensitivity, preclinical intensity, and sojourn time. The estimation of these parameters helps in optimizing screening programs and examine the improvement in survival. Multiple approaches exist to estimate those parameters. However, these models are based on strong underlying assumptions. The main aim of this article is to investigate the effect of these assumptions. For this purpose, we developed a simulator to mimic a breast cancer screening program directly observing the exact onset and the sojourn time of the disease. We investigate the effects of assuming the sensitivity to be constant, inter-screening interval and misspecifying the sojourn time. Our results indicate a strong correlation between the estimated parameters, and that the chosen sojourn time-distribution has a strong effect on the accuracy of the estimation. These findings shed a light on the seemingly discrepant results got by different authors using the same data sets but different assumptions.

preprint2020arXiv

Trend detection in GEV models

In recent environmental studies extreme events have a great impact. The yearly and monthly maxima of environment related indices can be analysed by the tools of extreme value theory. For instance, the monthly maxima of the fire weather index in British Columbian forests might be modelled by GEV distribution, but the stationarity of the time series is questionable. This property can lead us to different approaches to test if there is a significant trend in past few years data or not. An approach is a likelihood ratio based procedure which has favourable asymptotic properties, but for realistic sample sizes it might have a large error. In this paper we analyse the properties of the likelihood ratio test for extremes by bootstrap simulations and aim to determine a minimal required sample size. With the theoretical results we re-asses the trends of fire weather index in British Columbian forests.

preprint2016arXiv

Generalised block bootstrap and its use in meteorology

In an earlier paper Rakonczai et al. (2014), we have emphasized the effective sample size for autocorrelated data. The simulations were based on the block bootstrap methodology. However, the discreteness of the usual block size did not allow for exact calculations. In this paper we propose a generalisation of the block bootstrap methodology, relate it to the existing optimisation procedures and apply it to a temperature data set. Our other focus is on statistical tests, where quite often the actual sample size plays an important role, even in case of relatively large samples. This is especially the case for copulas. These are used for investigating the dependencies among data sets. As in quite a few real applications the time dependence cannot be neglected, we investigated the effect of this phenomenon to the used test statistic. The critical values can be computed by the proposed new block bootstrap simulation, where the block sizes are determined e.g. by fitting a VAR model to the observations. The results are illustrated for models of the used temperature data.

preprint2013arXiv

Applications of threshold models and the weighted bootstrap for Hungarian precipitation data

This paper presents applications of the peaks-over threshold methodology for both the univariate and the recently introduced bivariate case, combined with a novel bootstrap approach. We compare the proposed bootstrap methods to the more traditional profile likelihood. We have investigated 63 years of the European Climate Assessment daily precipitation data for five Hungarian grid points, first separately for the summer and winter months, then aiming at the detection of possible changes by investigating 20 years moving windows. We show that significant changes can be observed both in the univariate and the bivariate cases, the most recent period being the most dangerous, as the return levels here are the highest. We illustrate these effects by bivariate coverage regions.

preprint2012arXiv

Weighted bootstrap in GARCH models

GARCH models are useful tools in the investigation of phenomena, where volatility changes are prominent features, like most financial data. The parameter estimation via quasi maximum likelihood (QMLE) and its properties are by now well understood. However, there is a gap between practical applications and the theory, as in reality there are usually not enough observations for the limit results to be valid approximations. We try to fill this gap by this paper, where the properties of a recent bootstrap methodology in the context of GARCH modeling are revealed. The results are promising as it turns out that this remarkably simple method has essentially the same limit distribution, as the original estimatorwith the advantage of easy confidence interval construction, as it is demonstrated in the paper. The finite-sample properties of the suggested estimators are investigated through a simulation study, which ensures that the results are practically applicable for sample sizes as low as a thousand. On the other hand, the results are not 100% accurate until sample size reaches 100 thousands - but it is shown that this property is not a feature of our bootstrap procedure only, as it is shared by the original QMLE, too.