Paper detail

Weighted bootstrap in GARCH models

GARCH models are useful tools in the investigation of phenomena, where volatility changes are prominent features, like most financial data. The parameter estimation via quasi maximum likelihood (QMLE) and its properties are by now well understood. However, there is a gap between practical applications and the theory, as in reality there are usually not enough observations for the limit results to be valid approximations. We try to fill this gap by this paper, where the properties of a recent bootstrap methodology in the context of GARCH modeling are revealed. The results are promising as it turns out that this remarkably simple method has essentially the same limit distribution, as the original estimatorwith the advantage of easy confidence interval construction, as it is demonstrated in the paper. The finite-sample properties of the suggested estimators are investigated through a simulation study, which ensures that the results are practically applicable for sample sizes as low as a thousand. On the other hand, the results are not 100% accurate until sample size reaches 100 thousands - but it is shown that this property is not a feature of our bootstrap procedure only, as it is shared by the original QMLE, too.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.