Paper detail

how well can sensitivity and sojourn time be estimated

Chronic disease progression models are governed by three main parameters: sensitivity, preclinical intensity, and sojourn time. The estimation of these parameters helps in optimizing screening programs and examine the improvement in survival. Multiple approaches exist to estimate those parameters. However, these models are based on strong underlying assumptions. The main aim of this article is to investigate the effect of these assumptions. For this purpose, we developed a simulator to mimic a breast cancer screening program directly observing the exact onset and the sojourn time of the disease. We investigate the effects of assuming the sensitivity to be constant, inter-screening interval and misspecifying the sojourn time. Our results indicate a strong correlation between the estimated parameters, and that the chosen sojourn time-distribution has a strong effect on the accuracy of the estimation. These findings shed a light on the seemingly discrepant results got by different authors using the same data sets but different assumptions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.