BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

An Zeng

An Zeng contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.soc-phSocial and Information NetworksDigital LibrariesMachine Learningphysics.data-an

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

TFEC: Multivariate Time-Series Clustering via Temporal-Frequency Enhanced Contrastive Learning

Multivariate Time-Series (MTS) clustering is crucial for signal processing and data analysis. Although deep learning approaches, particularly those leveraging Contrastive Learning (CL), are prominent for MTS representation, existing CL-based models face two key limitations: 1) neglecting clustering information during positive/negative sample pair construction, and 2) introducing unreasonable inductive biases, e.g., destroying time dependence and periodicity through augmentation strategies, compromising representation quality. This paper, therefore, proposes a Temporal-Frequency Enhanced Contrastive (TFEC) learning framework. To preserve temporal structure while generating low-distortion representations, a temporal-frequency Co-EnHancement (CoEH) mechanism is introduced. Accordingly, a synergistic dual-path representation and cluster distribution learning framework is designed to jointly optimize cluster structure and representation fidelity. Experiments on six real-world benchmark datasets demonstrate TFEC's superiority, achieving 4.48% average NMI gains over SOTA methods, with ablation studies validating the design. The code of the paper is available at: https://github.com/yueliangy/TFEC.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Academic mentees succeed in big groups, but thrive in small groups

Mentoring is a key component of scientific achievements, contributing to overall measures of career success for mentees and mentors. A common success metric in the scientific enterprise is acquiring a large research group, which is believed to indicate excellent mentorship and high-quality research. However, large, competitive groups might also amplify dropout rates, which are high especially among early career researchers. Here, we collect longitudinal genealogical data on mentor-mentee relations and their publication, and study the effects of a mentor's group on future academic survival and performance of their mentees. We find that mentees trained in large groups generally have better academic performance than mentees from small groups, if they continue working in academia after graduation. However, we also find two surprising results: Academic survival rate is significantly lower for (1) mentees from larger groups, and for (2) mentees with more productive mentors. These findings reveal that success of mentors has a negative effect on the academic survival rate of mentees, raising important questions about the definition of successful mentorship and providing actionable suggestions concerning career development.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Impactful scientists have higher tendency to involve collaborators in new topics

In scientific research, collaboration is one of the most effective ways to take advantage of new ideas, skills, resources, and for performing interdisciplinary research. Although collaboration networks have been intensively studied, the question of how individual scientists choose collaborators to study a new research topic remains almost unexplored. Here, we investigate the statistics and mechanisms of collaborations of individual scientists along their careers, revealing that, in general, collaborators are involved in significantly fewer topics than expected from controlled surrogate. In particular, we find that highly productive scientists tend to have higher fraction of single-topic collaborators, while highly cited, i.e., impactful, scientists have higher fraction of multi-topic collaborators. We also suggest a plausible mechanism for this distinction. Moreover, we investigate the cases where scientists involve existing collaborators into a new topic. We find that compared to productive scientists, impactful scientists show strong preference of collaboration with high impact scientists on a new topic. Finally, we validate our findings by investigating active scientists in different years and across different disciplines.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Prediction Model Based on Integrated Political Economy System: The Case of US Presidential Election

This paper studies an integrated system of political and economic systems from a systematic perspective to explore the complex interaction between them, and specially analyzes the case of the US presidential election forecasting. Based on the signed association networks of industrial structure constructed by economic data, our framework simulates the diffusion and evolution of opinions during the election through a kinetic model called the Potts Model. Remarkably, we propose a simple and efficient prediction model for the US presidential election, and meanwhile inspire a new way to model the economic structure. Findings also highlight the close relationship between economic structure and political attitude. Furthermore, the case analysis in terms of network and economy demonstrates the specific features and the interaction between political tendency and industrial structure in a particular period, which is consistent with theories in politics and economics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The critical role of fresh teams in creating original and multi-disciplinary research

Teamwork is one of the most prominent features in modern science. It is now well-understood that the team size is an important factor that affects team creativity. However, the crucial question of how the character of research studies is influenced by the freshness of the team remains unclear. In this paper, we quantify the team freshness according to the absent of prior collaboration among team members. Our results suggest that fresher teams tend to produce works of higher originality and more multi-disciplinary impact. These effects are even magnified in larger teams. Furthermore, we find that freshness defined by new team members in a paper is a more effective indicator of research originality and multi-disciplinarity compared to freshness defined by new collaboration relations among team members. Finally, we show that career freshness of members also plays an important role in increasing the originality and multi-disciplinarity of produced papers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access