Paper detail

Academic mentees succeed in big groups, but thrive in small groups

Mentoring is a key component of scientific achievements, contributing to overall measures of career success for mentees and mentors. A common success metric in the scientific enterprise is acquiring a large research group, which is believed to indicate excellent mentorship and high-quality research. However, large, competitive groups might also amplify dropout rates, which are high especially among early career researchers. Here, we collect longitudinal genealogical data on mentor-mentee relations and their publication, and study the effects of a mentor's group on future academic survival and performance of their mentees. We find that mentees trained in large groups generally have better academic performance than mentees from small groups, if they continue working in academia after graduation. However, we also find two surprising results: Academic survival rate is significantly lower for (1) mentees from larger groups, and for (2) mentees with more productive mentors. These findings reveal that success of mentors has a negative effect on the academic survival rate of mentees, raising important questions about the definition of successful mentorship and providing actionable suggestions concerning career development.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.