BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Amir Abboud

Amir Abboud appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityDiscrete MathematicsDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Catalog footprint

What is connected

18works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

18 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A Truly Subcubic Combinatorial Algorithm for Induced 4-Cycle Detection

We present the first truly subcubic, combinatorial algorithm for detecting an induced $4$-cycle in a graph. The running time is $O(n^{2.84})$ on $n$-node graphs, thus separating the task of detecting induced $4$-cycles from detecting triangles, which requires $n^{3-o(1)}$ time combinatorially under the popular BMM hypothesis. Significant work has gone into characterizing the exact time complexity of induced $H$-detection, relative to the complexity of detecting cliques of various sizes. Prior work identified the question of whether induced $4$-cycle detection is triangle-hard as the only remaining case towards completing the lowest level of the classification, dubbing it a "curious" case [Dalirrooyfard, Vassilevska W., FOCS 2022]. Our result can be seen as a negative resolution of this question. Our algorithm deviates from previous techniques in the large body of subgraph detection algorithms and employs the trendy topic of graph decomposition that has hitherto been restricted to more global problems (as in the use of expander decompositions for flow problems) or to shaving subpolynomial factors (as in the application of graph regularity lemmas). While our algorithm is slower than the (non-combinatorial) state-of-the-art $\tilde{O}(n^ω)$-time algorithm based on polynomial identity testing [Vassilevska W., Wang, Williams, Yu, SODA 2014], combinatorial advancements often come with other benefits. In particular, we give the first nontrivial deterministic algorithm for detecting induced $4$-cycles.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Breaking the Cubic Barrier for All-Pairs Max-Flow: Gomory-Hu Tree in Nearly Quadratic Time

In 1961, Gomory and Hu showed that the All-Pairs Max-Flow problem of computing the max-flow between all $n\choose 2$ pairs of vertices in an undirected graph can be solved using only $n-1$ calls to any (single-pair) max-flow algorithm. Even assuming a linear-time max-flow algorithm, this yields a running time of $O(mn)$, which is $O(n^3)$ when $m = Θ(n^2)$. While subsequent work has improved this bound for various special graph classes, no subcubic-time algorithm has been obtained in the last 60 years for general graphs. We break this longstanding barrier by giving an $\tilde{O}(n^{2})$-time algorithm on general, weighted graphs. Combined with a popular complexity assumption, we establish a counter-intuitive separation: all-pairs max-flows are strictly easier to compute than all-pairs shortest-paths. Our algorithm produces a cut-equivalent tree, known as the Gomory-Hu tree, from which the max-flow value for any pair can be retrieved in near-constant time. For unweighted graphs, we refine our techniques further to produce a Gomory-Hu tree in the time of a poly-logarithmic number of calls to any max-flow algorithm. This shows an equivalence between the all-pairs and single-pair max-flow problems, and is optimal up to poly-logarithmic factors. Using the recently announced $m^{1+o(1)}$-time max-flow algorithm (Chen et al., March 2022), our Gomory-Hu tree algorithm for unweighted graphs also runs in $m^{1+o(1)}$-time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Improved Approximation Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Search-Diversification Problems

We study several questions related to diversifying search results. We give improved approximation algorithms in each of the following problems, together with some lower bounds. - We give a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for a diversified search ranking problem [Bansal et al., ICALP 2010] whose objective is to minimizes the discounted cumulative gain. Our PTAS runs in time $n^{2^{O(\log(1/ε)/ε)}} \cdot m^{O(1)}$ where $n$ denotes the number of elements in the databases. Complementing this, we show that no PTAS can run in time $f(ε) \cdot (nm)^{2^{o(1/ε)}}$ assuming Gap-ETH; therefore our running time is nearly tight. Both of our bounds answer open questions of Bansal et al. - We next consider the Max-Sum Dispersion problem, whose objective is to select $k$ out of $n$ elements that maximizes the dispersion, which is defined as the sum of the pairwise distances under a given metric. We give a quasipolynomial-time approximation scheme for the problem which runs in time $n^{O_ε(\log n)}$. This improves upon previously known polynomial-time algorithms with approximate ratios 0.5 [Hassin et al., Oper. Res. Lett. 1997; Borodin et al., ACM Trans. Algorithms 2017]. Furthermore, we observe that known reductions rule out approximation schemes that run in $n^{\tilde{o}_ε(\log n)}$ time assuming ETH. - We consider a generalization of Max-Sum Dispersion called Max-Sum Diversification. In addition to the sum of pairwise distance, the objective includes another function $f$. For monotone submodular $f$, we give a quasipolynomial-time algorithm with approximation ratio arbitrarily close to $(1 - 1/e)$. This improves upon the best polynomial-time algorithm which has approximation ratio $0.5$ by Borodin et al. Furthermore, the $(1 - 1/e)$ factor is tight as achieving better-than-$(1 - 1/e)$ approximation is NP-hard [Feige, J. ACM 1998].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

SETH-Based Lower Bounds for Subset Sum and Bicriteria Path

Subset-Sum and k-SAT are two of the most extensively studied problems in computer science, and conjectures about their hardness are among the cornerstones of fine-grained complexity. One of the most intriguing open problems in this area is to base the hardness of one of these problems on the other. Our main result is a tight reduction from k-SAT to Subset-Sum on dense instances, proving that Bellman's 1962 pseudo-polynomial $O^{*}(T)$-time algorithm for Subset-Sum on $n$ numbers and target $T$ cannot be improved to time $T^{1-\varepsilon}\cdot 2^{o(n)}$ for any $\varepsilon>0$, unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) fails. This is one of the strongest known connections between any two of the core problems of fine-grained complexity. As a corollary, we prove a "Direct-OR" theorem for Subset-Sum under SETH, offering a new tool for proving conditional lower bounds: It is now possible to assume that deciding whether one out of $N$ given instances of Subset-Sum is a YES instance requires time $(N T)^{1-o(1)}$. As an application of this corollary, we prove a tight SETH-based lower bound for the classical Bicriteria s,t-Path problem, which is extensively studied in Operations Research. We separate its complexity from that of Subset-Sum: On graphs with $m$ edges and edge lengths bounded by $L$, we show that the $O(Lm)$ pseudo-polynomial time algorithm by Joksch from 1966 cannot be improved to $\tilde{O}(L+m)$, in contrast to a recent improvement for Subset Sum (Bringmann, SODA 2017).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Cut-Equivalent Trees are Optimal for Min-Cut Queries

Min-Cut queries are fundamental: Preprocess an undirected edge-weighted graph, to quickly report a minimum-weight cut that separates a query pair of nodes $s,t$. The best data structure known for this problem simply builds a cut-equivalent tree, discovered 60 years ago by Gomory and Hu, who also showed how to construct it using $n-1$ minimum $st$-cut computations. Using state-of-the-art algorithms for minimum $st$-cut (Lee and Sidford, FOCS 2014) arXiv:1312.6713, one can construct the tree in time $\tilde{O}(mn^{3/2})$, which is also the preprocessing time of the data structure. (Throughout, we focus on polynomially-bounded edge weights, noting that faster algorithms are known for small/unit edge weights.) Our main result shows the following equivalence: Cut-equivalent trees can be constructed in near-linear time if and only if there is a data structure for Min-Cut queries with near-linear preprocessing time and polylogarithmic (amortized) query time, and even if the queries are restricted to a fixed source. That is, equivalent trees are an essentially optimal solution for Min-Cut queries. This equivalence holds even for every minor-closed family of graphs, such as bounded-treewidth graphs, for which a two-decade old data structure (Arikati et al., J.~Algorithms 1998) implies the first near-linear time construction of cut-equivalent trees. Moreover, unlike all previous techniques for constructing cut-equivalent trees, ours is robust to relying on approximation algorithms. In particular, using the almost-linear time algorithm for $(1+ε)$-approximate minimum $st$-cut (Kelner et al., SODA 2014), we can construct a $(1+ε)$-approximate flow-equivalent tree (which is a slightly weaker notion) in time $n^{2+o(1)}$. This leads to the first $(1+ε)$-approximation for All-Pairs Max-Flow that runs in time $n^{2+o(1)}$, and matches the output size almost-optimally.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

New Hardness Results for Planar Graph Problems in P and an Algorithm for Sparsest Cut

The Sparsest Cut is a fundamental optimization problem that has been extensively studied. For planar inputs the problem is in $P$ and can be solved in $\tilde{O}(n^3)$ time if all vertex weights are $1$. Despite a significant amount of effort, the best algorithms date back to the early 90's and can only achieve $O(\log n)$-approximation in $\tilde{O}(n)$ time or a constant factor approximation in $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ time [Rao, STOC92]. Our main result is an $Ω(n^{2-ε})$ lower bound for Sparsest Cut even in planar graphs with unit vertex weights, under the $(min,+)$-Convolution conjecture, showing that approximations are inevitable in the near-linear time regime. To complement the lower bound, we provide a constant factor approximation in near-linear time, improving upon the 25-year old result of Rao in both time and accuracy. Our lower bound accomplishes a repeatedly raised challenge by being the first fine-grained lower bound for a natural planar graph problem in P. Moreover, we prove near-quadratic lower bounds under SETH for variants of the closest pair problem in planar graphs, and use them to show that the popular Average-Linkage procedure for Hierarchical Clustering cannot be simulated in truly subquadratic time. We prove an $Ω(n/\log{n})$ lower bound on the number of communication rounds required to compute the weighted diameter of a network in the CONGEST model, even when the underlying graph is planar and all nodes are $D=4$ hops away from each other. This is the first poly($n$) + $ω(D)$ lower bound in the planar-distributed setting, and it complements the recent poly$(D, \log{n})$ upper bounds of Li and Parter [STOC 2019] for (exact) unweighted diameter and for ($1+ε$) approximate weighted diameter.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Scheduling Lower Bounds via AND Subset Sum

Given $N$ instances $(X_1,t_1),\ldots,(X_N,t_N)$ of Subset Sum, the AND Subset Sum problem asks to determine whether all of these instances are yes-instances; that is, whether each set of integers $X_i$ has a subset that sums up to the target integer $t_i$. We prove that this problem cannot be solved in time $\tilde{O}((N \cdot t_{max})^{1-ε})$, for $t_{max}=\max_i t_i$ and any $ε> 0$, assuming the $\forall \exists$ Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis ($\forall \exists$-SETH). We then use this result to exclude $\tilde{O}(n+P_{max} \cdot n^{1-ε})$-time algorithms for several scheduling problems on $n$ jobs with maximum processing time $P_{max}$, based on $\forall \exists$-SETH. These include classical problems such as $1||\sum w_jU_j$, the problem of minimizing the total weight of tardy jobs on a single machine, and $P_2||\sum U_j$, the problem of minimizing the number of tardy jobs on two identical parallel machines.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The 4/3 Additive Spanner Exponent is Tight

A spanner is a sparse subgraph that approximately preserves the pairwise distances of the original graph. It is well known that there is a smooth tradeoff between the sparsity of a spanner and the quality of its approximation, so long as distance error is measured multiplicatively. A central open question in the field is to prove or disprove whether such a tradeoff exists also in the regime of \emph{additive} error. That is, is it true that for all $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant $k_{\varepsilon}$ such that every graph has a spanner on $O(n^{1+\varepsilon})$ edges that preserves its pairwise distances up to $+k_{\varepsilon}$? Previous lower bounds are consistent with a positive resolution to this question, while previous upper bounds exhibit the beginning of a tradeoff curve: all graphs have $+2$ spanners on $O(n^{3/2})$ edges, $+4$ spanners on $\tilde{O}(n^{7/5})$ edges, and $+6$ spanners on $O(n^{4/3})$ edges. However, progress has mysteriously halted at the $n^{4/3}$ bound, and despite significant effort from the community, the question has remained open for all $0 < \varepsilon < 1/3$. Our main result is a surprising negative resolution of the open question, even in a highly generalized setting. We show a new information theoretic incompressibility bound: there is no function that compresses graphs into $O(n^{4/3 - \varepsilon})$ bits so that distance information can be recovered within $+n^{o(1)}$ error. As a special case of our theorem, we get a tight lower bound on the sparsity of additive spanners: the $+6$ spanner on $O(n^{4/3})$ edges cannot be improved in the exponent, even if any subpolynomial amount of additive error is allowed. Our theorem implies new lower bounds for related objects as well; for example, the twenty-year-old $+4$ emulator on $O(n^{4/3})$ edges also cannot be improved in the exponent unless the error allowance is polynomial.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Near-Linear Lower Bounds for Distributed Distance Computations, Even in Sparse Networks

We develop a new technique for constructing sparse graphs that allow us to prove near-linear lower bounds on the round complexity of computing distances in the CONGEST model. Specifically, we show an $\widetildeΩ(n)$ lower bound for computing the diameter in sparse networks, which was previously known only for dense networks [Frishknecht et al., SODA 2012]. In fact, we can even modify our construction to obtain graphs with constant degree, using a simple but powerful degree-reduction technique which we define. Moreover, our technique allows us to show $\widetildeΩ(n)$ lower bounds for computing $(\frac{3}{2}-\varepsilon)$-approximations of the diameter or the radius, and for computing a $(\frac{5}{3}-\varepsilon)$-approximation of all eccentricities. For radius, we are unaware of any previous lower bounds. For diameter, these greatly improve upon previous lower bounds and are tight up to polylogarithmic factors [Frishknecht et al., SODA 2012], and for eccentricities the improvement is both in the lower bound and in the approximation factor [Holzer and Wattenhofer, PODC 2012]. Interestingly, our technique also allows showing an almost-linear lower bound for the verification of $(α,β)$-spanners, for $α< β+1$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Popular Conjectures as a Barrier for Dynamic Planar Graph Algorithms

The dynamic shortest paths problem on planar graphs asks us to preprocess a planar graph $G$ such that we may support insertions and deletions of edges in $G$ as well as distance queries between any two nodes $u,v$ subject to the constraint that the graph remains planar at all times. This problem has been extensively studied in both the theory and experimental communities over the past decades and gets solved millions of times every day by companies like Google, Microsoft, and Uber. The best known algorithm performs queries and updates in $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3})$ time, based on ideas of a seminal paper by Fakcharoenphol and Rao [FOCS'01]. A $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm of Abraham et al. [STOC'12] performs updates and queries in $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ time. An algorithm with $O(polylog(n))$ runtime would be a major breakthrough. However, such runtimes are only known for a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation in a model where only restricted weight updates are allowed due to Abraham et al. [SODA'16], or for easier problems like connectivity. In this paper, we follow a recent and very active line of work on showing lower bounds for polynomial time problems based on popular conjectures, obtaining the first such results for natural problems in planar graphs. Such results were previously out of reach due to the highly non-planar nature of known reductions and the impossibility of "planarizing gadgets". We introduce a new framework which is inspired by techniques from the literatures on distance labelling schemes and on parameterized complexity. Using our framework, we show that no algorithm for dynamic shortest paths or maximum weight bipartite matching in planar graphs can support both updates and queries in amortized $O(n^{\frac{1}{2}-\varepsilon})$ time, for $\varepsilon>0$, unless the classical APSP problem can be solved in truly subcubic time, [...]

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Approximation and Fixed Parameter Subquadratic Algorithms for Radius and Diameter

The radius and diameter are fundamental graph parameters. They are defined as the minimum and maximum of the eccentricities in a graph, respectively, where the eccentricity of a vertex is the largest distance from the vertex to another node. In directed graphs, there are several versions of these problems. For instance, one may choose to define the eccentricity of a node in terms of the largest distance into the node, out of the node, the sum of the two directions (i.e. roundtrip) and so on. All versions of diameter and radius can be solved via solving all-pairs shortest paths (APSP), followed by a fast postprocessing step. Solving APSP, however, on $n$-node graphs requires $Ω(n^2)$ time even in sparse graphs, as one needs to output $n^2$ distances. Motivated by known and new negative results on the impossibility of computing these measures exactly in general graphs in truly subquadratic time, under plausible assumptions, we search for \emph{approximation} and \emph{fixed parameter subquadratic} algorithms, and for reasons why they do not exist. Our results include: - Truly subquadratic approximation algorithms for most of the versions of Diameter and Radius with \emph{optimal} approximation guarantees (given truly subquadratic time), under plausible assumptions. In particular, there is a $2$-approximation algorithm for directed Radius with one-way distances that runs in $\tilde{O}(m\sqrt{n})$ time, while a $(2-δ)$-approximation algorithm in $O(n^{2-ε})$ time is unlikely. - On graphs with treewidth $k$, we can solve the problems in $2^{O(k\log{k})}n^{1+o(1)}$ time. We show that these algorithms are near optimal since even a $(3/2-δ)$-approximation algorithm that runs in time $2^{o(k)}n^{2-ε}$ would refute the plausible assumptions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

If the Current Clique Algorithms are Optimal, so is Valiant's Parser

The CFG recognition problem is: given a context-free grammar $\mathcal{G}$ and a string $w$ of length $n$, decide if $w$ can be obtained from $\mathcal{G}$. This is the most basic parsing question and is a core computer science problem. Valiant's parser from 1975 solves the problem in $O(n^ω)$ time, where $ω<2.373$ is the matrix multiplication exponent. Dozens of parsing algorithms have been proposed over the years, yet Valiant's upper bound remains unbeaten. The best combinatorial algorithms have mildly subcubic $O(n^3/\log^3{n})$ complexity. Lee (JACM'01) provided evidence that fast matrix multiplication is needed for CFG parsing, and that very efficient and practical algorithms might be hard or even impossible to obtain. Lee showed that any algorithm for a more general parsing problem with running time $O(|\mathcal{G}|\cdot n^{3-\varepsilon})$ can be converted into a surprising subcubic algorithm for Boolean Matrix Multiplication. Unfortunately, Lee's hardness result required that the grammar size be $|\mathcal{G}|=Ω(n^6)$. Nothing was known for the more relevant case of constant size grammars. In this work, we prove that any improvement on Valiant's algorithm, even for constant size grammars, either in terms of runtime or by avoiding the inefficiencies of fast matrix multiplication, would imply a breakthrough algorithm for the $k$-Clique problem: given a graph on $n$ nodes, decide if there are $k$ that form a clique. Besides classifying the complexity of a fundamental problem, our reduction has led us to similar lower bounds for more modern and well-studied cubic time problems for which faster algorithms are highly desirable in practice: RNA Folding, a central problem in computational biology, and Dyck Language Edit Distance, answering an open question of Saha (FOCS'14).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Losing Weight by Gaining Edges

We present a new way to encode weighted sums into unweighted pairwise constraints, obtaining the following results. - Define the k-SUM problem to be: given n integers in [-n^2k, n^2k] are there k which sum to zero? (It is well known that the same problem over arbitrary integers is equivalent to the above definition, by linear-time randomized reductions.) We prove that this definition of k-SUM remains W[1]-hard, and is in fact W[1]-complete: k-SUM can be reduced to f(k) * n^o(1) instances of k-Clique. - The maximum node-weighted k-Clique and node-weighted k-dominating set problems can be reduced to n^o(1) instances of the unweighted k-Clique and k-dominating set problems, respectively. This implies a strong equivalence between the time complexities of the node weighted problems and the unweighted problems: any polynomial improvement on one would imply an improvement for the other. - A triangle of weight 0 in a node weighted graph with m edges can be deterministically found in m^1.41 time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Quadratic-Time Hardness of LCS and other Sequence Similarity Measures

Two important similarity measures between sequences are the longest common subsequence (LCS) and the dynamic time warping distance (DTWD). The computations of these measures for two given sequences are central tasks in a variety of applications. Simple dynamic programming algorithms solve these tasks in $O(n^2)$ time, and despite an extensive amount of research, no algorithms with significantly better worst case upper bounds are known. In this paper, we show that an $O(n^{2-ε})$ time algorithm, for some $ε>0$, for computing the LCS or the DTWD of two sequences of length $n$ over a constant size alphabet, refutes the popular Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). Moreover, we show that computing the LCS of $k$ strings over an alphabet of size $O(k)$ cannot be done in $O(n^{k-ε})$ time, for any $ε>0$, under SETH. Finally, we also address the time complexity of approximating the DTWD of two strings in truly subquadratic time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Simulating Branching Programs with Edit Distance and Friends or: A Polylog Shaved is a Lower Bound Made

A recent and active line of work achieves tight lower bounds for fundamental problems under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). A celebrated result of Backurs and Indyk (STOC'15) proves that the Edit Distance of two sequences of length n cannot be computed in strongly subquadratic time under SETH. The result was extended by follow-up works to simpler looking problems like finding the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS). SETH is a very strong assumption, asserting that even linear size CNF formulas cannot be analyzed for satisfiability with an exponential speedup over exhaustive search. We consider much safer assumptions, e.g. that such a speedup is impossible for SAT on much more expressive representations, like NC circuits. Intuitively, this seems much more plausible: NC circuits can implement complex cryptographic primitives, while CNFs cannot even approximately compute an XOR of bits. Our main result is a surprising reduction from SAT on Branching Programs to fundamental problems in P like Edit Distance, LCS, and many others. Truly subquadratic algorithms for these problems therefore have consequences that we consider to be far more remarkable than merely faster CNF SAT algorithms. For example, SAT on arbitrary o(n)-depth bounded fan-in circuits (and therefore also NC-Circuit-SAT) can be solved in (2-eps)^n time. A very interesting feature of our work is that we can prove major consequences even from mildly subquadratic algorithms for Edit Distance or LCS. For example, we show that if we can shave an arbitrarily large polylog factor from n^2 for Edit Distance then NEXP does not have non-uniform NC^1 circuits. A more fine-grained examination shows that even shaving a $\log^c{n}$ factor, for a specific constant $c \approx 10^3$, already implies new circuit lower bounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Subtree Isomorphism Revisited

The Subtree Isomorphism problem asks whether a given tree is contained in another given tree. The problem is of fundamental importance and has been studied since the 1960s. For some variants, e.g., ordered trees, near-linear time algorithms are known, but for the general case truly subquadratic algorithms remain elusive. Our first result is a reduction from the Orthogonal Vectors problem to Subtree Isomorphism, showing that a truly subquadratic algorithm for the latter refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). In light of this conditional lower bound, we focus on natural special cases for which no truly subquadratic algorithms are known. We classify these cases against the quadratic barrier, showing in particular that: -- Even for binary, rooted trees, a truly subquadratic algorithm refutes SETH. -- Even for rooted trees of depth $O(\log\log{n})$, where $n$ is the total number of vertices, a truly subquadratic algorithm refutes SETH. -- For every constant $d$, there is a constant $ε_d>0$ and a randomized, truly subquadratic algorithm for degree-$d$ rooted trees of depth at most $(1+ ε_d) \log_{d}{n}$. In particular, there is an $O(\min\{ 2.85^h ,n^2 \})$ algorithm for binary trees of depth $h$. Our reductions utilize new "tree gadgets" that are likely useful for future SETH-based lower bounds for problems on trees. Our upper bounds apply a folklore result from randomized decision tree complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Popular conjectures imply strong lower bounds for dynamic problems

We consider several well-studied problems in dynamic algorithms and prove that sufficient progress on any of them would imply a breakthrough on one of five major open problems in the theory of algorithms: 1. Is the 3SUM problem on $n$ numbers in $O(n^{2-ε})$ time for some $ε>0$? 2. Can one determine the satisfiability of a CNF formula on $n$ variables in $O((2-ε)^n poly n)$ time for some $ε>0$? 3. Is the All Pairs Shortest Paths problem for graphs on $n$ vertices in $O(n^{3-ε})$ time for some $ε>0$? 4. Is there a linear time algorithm that detects whether a given graph contains a triangle? 5. Is there an $O(n^{3-ε})$ time combinatorial algorithm for $n\times n$ Boolean matrix multiplication? The problems we consider include dynamic versions of bipartite perfect matching, bipartite maximum weight matching, single source reachability, single source shortest paths, strong connectivity, subgraph connectivity, diameter approximation and some nongraph problems such as Pagh's problem defined in a recent paper by Patrascu [STOC 2010].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Exact Weight Subgraphs and the k-Sum Conjecture

We consider the Exact-Weight-H problem of finding a (not necessarily induced) subgraph H of weight 0 in an edge-weighted graph G. We show that for every H, the complexity of this problem is strongly related to that of the infamous k-Sum problem. In particular, we show that under the k-Sum Conjecture, we can achieve tight upper and lower bounds for the Exact-Weight-H problem for various subgraphs H such as matching, star, path, and cycle. One interesting consequence is that improving on the O(n^3) upper bound for Exact-Weight-4-Path or Exact-Weight-5-Path will imply improved algorithms for 3-Sum, 5-Sum, All-Pairs Shortest Paths and other fundamental problems. This is in sharp contrast to the minimum-weight and (unweighted) detection versions, which can be solved easily in time O(n^2). We also show that a faster algorithm for any of the following three problems would yield faster algorithms for the others: 3-Sum, Exact-Weight-3-Matching, and Exact-Weight-3-Star.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access