BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Virginia Vassilevska Williams

Virginia Vassilevska Williams appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityComputer Science and Game TheoryDiscrete MathematicsMultiagent Systemsquant-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

23works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

23 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Hardness for Triangle Problems under Even More Believable Hypotheses: Reductions from Real APSP, Real 3SUM, and OV

The $3$SUM hypothesis, the APSP hypothesis and SETH are the three main hypotheses in fine-grained complexity. So far, within the area, the first two hypotheses have mainly been about integer inputs in the Word RAM model of computation. The "Real APSP" and "Real $3$SUM" hypotheses, which assert that the APSP and $3$SUM hypotheses hold for real-valued inputs in a reasonable version of the Real RAM model, are even more believable than their integer counterparts. Under the very believable hypothesis that at least one of the Integer $3$SUM hypothesis, Integer APSP hypothesis or SETH is true, Abboud, Vassilevska W. and Yu [STOC 2015] showed that a problem called Triangle Collection requires $n^{3-o(1)}$ time on an $n$-node graph. Our main result is a nontrivial lower bound for a slight generalization of Triangle Collection, called All-Color-Pairs Triangle Collection, under the even more believable hypothesis that at least one of the Real $3$SUM, the Real APSP, and the OV hypotheses is true. Combined with slight modifications of prior reductions, we obtain polynomial conditional lower bounds for problems such as the (static) ST-Max Flow problem and dynamic Max Flow, now under the new weaker hypothesis. Our main result is built on the following two lines of reductions. * Real APSP and Real $3$SUM hardness for the All-Edges Sparse Triangle problem. Prior reductions only worked from the integer variants of these problems. * Real APSP and OV hardness for a variant of the Boolean Matrix Multiplication problem. Along the way we show that Triangle Collection is equivalent to a simpler restricted version of the problem, simplifying prior work. Our techniques also have other interesting implications, such as a super-linear lower bound of Integer All-Numbers $3$SUM based on the Real $3$SUM hypothesis, and a tight lower bound for a string matching problem based on the OV hypothesis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Hardness of Token Swapping on Trees

Given a graph where every vertex has exactly one labeled token, how can we most quickly execute a given permutation on the tokens? In (sequential) token swapping, the goal is to use the shortest possible sequence of swaps, each of which exchanges the tokens at the two endpoints of an edge of the graph. In parallel token swapping, the goal is to use the fewest rounds, each of which consists of one or more swaps on the edges of a matching. We prove that both of these problems remain NP-hard when the graph is restricted to be a tree. These token swapping problems have been studied by disparate groups of researchers in discrete mathematics, theoretical computer science, robot motion planning, game theory, and engineering. Previous work establishes NP-completeness on general graphs (for both problems); polynomial-time algorithms for simple graph classes such as cliques, stars, paths, and cycles; and constant-factor approximation algorithms in some cases. The two natural cases of sequential and parallel token swapping in trees were first studied over thirty years ago (as "sorting with a transposition tree") and over twenty-five years ago (as "routing permutations via matchings"), yet their complexities were previously unknown. We also show limitations on approximation of sequential token swapping on trees: we identify a broad class of algorithms that encompass all three known polynomial-time algorithms that achieve the best known approximation factor (which is $2$) and show that no such algorithm can achieve an approximation factor less than $2$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Listing, Verifying and Counting Lowest Common Ancestors in DAGs: Algorithms and Fine-Grained Lower Bounds

The AP-LCA problem asks, given an $n$-node directed acyclic graph (DAG), to compute for every pair of vertices $u$ and $v$ in the DAG a lowest common ancestor (LCA) of $u$ and $v$ if one exists. In this paper we study several interesting variants of AP-LCA, providing both algorithms and fine-grained lower bounds for them. The lower bounds we obtain are the first conditional lower bounds for LCA problems higher than $n^{ω-o(1)}$, where $ω$ is the matrix multiplication exponent. Some of our results include: - In any DAG, we can detect all vertex pairs that have at most two LCAs and list all of their LCAs in $O(n^ω)$ time. This algorithm extends a result of [Kowaluk and Lingas ESA'07] which showed an $\tilde{O}(n^ω)$ time algorithm that detects all pairs with a unique LCA in a DAG and outputs their corresponding LCAs. - Listing $7$ LCAs per vertex pair in DAGs requires $n^{3-o(1)}$ time under the popular assumption that 3-uniform 5-hyperclique detection requires $n^{5-o(1)}$ time. This is surprising since essentially cubic time is sufficient to list all LCAs (if $ω=2$). - Counting the number of LCAs for every vertex pair in a DAG requires $n^{3-o(1)}$ time under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis, and $n^{ω(1,2,1)-o(1)}$ time under the $4$-Clique hypothesis. This shows that the algorithm of [Echkardt, Mühling and Nowak ESA'07] for listing all LCAs for every pair of vertices is likely optimal. - Given a DAG and a vertex $w_{u,v}$ for every vertex pair $u,v$, verifying whether all $w_{u,v}$ are valid LCAs requires $n^{2.5-o(1)}$ time assuming 3-uniform 4-hyperclique requires $n^{4 - o(1)}$ time. This defies the common intuition that verification is easier than computation since returning some LCA per vertex pair can be solved in $O(n^{2.447})$ time [Grandoni et al. SODA'21].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Near-Tight Algorithms for the Chamberlin-Courant and Thiele Voting Rules

We present an almost optimal algorithm for the classic Chamberlin-Courant multiwinner voting rule (CC) on single-peaked preference profiles. Given $n$ voters and $m$ candidates, it runs in almost linear time in the input size, improving the previous best $O(nm^2)$ time algorithm of Betzler et al. (2013). We also study multiwinner voting rules on nearly single-peaked preference profiles in terms of the candidate-deletion operation. We show a polynomial-time algorithm for CC where a given candidate-deletion set $D$ has logarithmic size. Actually, our algorithm runs in $2^{|D|} \cdot poly(n,m)$ time and the base of the power cannot be improved under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. We also adapt these results to all non-constant Thiele rules which generalize CC with approval ballots.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Algorithms, Reductions and Equivalences for Small Weight Variants of All-Pairs Shortest Paths

APSP with small integer weights in undirected graphs [Seidel'95, Galil and Margalit'97] has an $\tilde{O}(n^ω)$ time algorithm, where $ω<2.373$ is the matrix multiplication exponent. APSP in directed graphs with small weights however, has a much slower running time that would be $Ω(n^{2.5})$ even if $ω=2$ [Zwick'02]. To understand this $n^{2.5}$ bottleneck, we build a web of reductions around directed unweighted APSP. We show that it is fine-grained equivalent to computing a rectangular Min-Plus product for matrices with integer entries; the dimensions and entry size of the matrices depend on the value of $ω$. As a consequence, we establish an equivalence between APSP in directed unweighted graphs, APSP in directed graphs with small $(\tilde{O}(1))$ integer weights, All-Pairs Longest Paths in DAGs with small weights, approximate APSP with additive error $c$ in directed graphs with small weights, for $c\le \tilde{O}(1)$ and several other graph problems. We also provide fine-grained reductions from directed unweighted APSP to All-Pairs Shortest Lightest Paths (APSLP) in undirected graphs with $\{0,1\}$ weights and $\#_{\text{mod}\ c}$APSP in directed unweighted graphs (computing counts mod $c$). We complement our hardness results with new algorithms. We improve the known algorithms for APSLP in directed graphs with small integer weights and for approximate APSP with sublinear additive error in directed unweighted graphs. Our algorithm for approximate APSP with sublinear additive error is optimal, when viewed as a reduction to Min-Plus product. We also give new algorithms for variants of #APSP in unweighted graphs, as well as a near-optimal $\tilde{O}(n^3)$-time algorithm for the original #APSP problem in unweighted graphs. Our techniques also lead to a simpler alternative for the original APSP problem in undirected graphs with small integer weights.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Conditionally optimal approximation algorithms for the girth of a directed graph

It is known that a better than $2$-approximation algorithm for the girth in dense directed unweighted graphs needs $n^{3-o(1)}$ time unless one uses fast matrix multiplication. Meanwhile, the best known approximation factor for a combinatorial algorithm running in $O(mn^{1-ε})$ time (by Chechik et al.) is $3$. Is the true answer $2$ or $3$? The main result of this paper is a (conditionally) tight approximation algorithm for directed graphs. First, we show that under a popular hardness assumption, any algorithm, even one that exploits fast matrix multiplication, would need to take at least $mn^{1-o(1)}$ time for some sparsity $m$ if it achieves a $(2-ε)$-approximation for any $ε>0$. Second we give a $2$-approximation algorithm for the girth of unweighted graphs running in $\tilde{O}(mn^{3/4})$ time, and a $(2+ε)$-approximation algorithm (for any $ε>0$) that works in weighted graphs and runs in $\tilde{O}(m\sqrt n)$ time. Our algorithms are combinatorial. We also obtain a $(4+ε)$-approximation of the girth running in $\tilde{O}(mn^{\sqrt{2}-1})$ time, improving upon the previous best $\tilde{O}(m\sqrt n)$ running time by Chechik et al. Finally, we consider the computation of roundtrip spanners. We obtain a $(5+ε)$-approximate roundtrip spanner on $\tilde{O}(n^{1.5}/ε^2)$ edges in $\tilde{O}(m\sqrt n/ε^2)$ time. This improves upon the previous approximation factor $(8+ε)$ of Chechik et al. for the same running time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Equivalences between triangle and range query problems

We define a natural class of range query problems, and prove that all problems within this class have the same time complexity (up to polylogarithmic factors). The equivalence is very general, and even applies to online algorithms. This allows us to obtain new improved algorithms for all of the problems in the class. We then focus on the special case of the problems when the queries are offline and the number of queries is linear. We show that our range query problems are runtime-equivalent (up to polylogarithmic factors) to counting for each edge $e$ in an $m$-edge graph the number of triangles through $e$. This natural triangle problem can be solved using the best known triangle counting algorithm, running in $O(m^{2ω/(ω+1)}) \leq O(m^{1.41})$ time. Moreover, if $ω=2$, the $O(m^{2ω/(ω+1)})$ running time is known to be tight (within $m^{o(1)}$ factors) under the 3SUM Hypothesis. In this case, our equivalence settles the complexity of the range query problems. Our problems constitute the first equivalence class with this peculiar running time bound. To better understand the complexity of these problems, we also provide a deeper insight into the family of triangle problems, in particular showing black-box reductions between triangle listing and per-edge triangle detection and counting. As a byproduct of our reductions, we obtain a simple triangle listing algorithm matching the state-of-the-art for all regimes of the number of triangles. We also give some not necessarily tight, but still surprising reductions from variants of matrix products, such as the $(\min,\max)$-product.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Monochromatic Triangles, Triangle Listing and APSP

One of the main hypotheses in fine-grained complexity is that All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) for $n$-node graphs requires $n^{3-o(1)}$ time. Another famous hypothesis is that the $3$SUM problem for $n$ integers requires $n^{2-o(1)}$ time. Although there are no direct reductions between $3$SUM and APSP, it is known that they are related: there is a problem, $(\min,+)$-convolution that reduces in a fine-grained way to both, and a problem Exact Triangle that both fine-grained reduce to. In this paper we find more relationships between these two problems and other basic problems. Pătraşcu had shown that under the $3$SUM hypothesis the All-Edges Sparse Triangle problem in $m$-edge graphs requires $m^{4/3-o(1)}$ time. The latter problem asks to determine for every edge $e$, whether $e$ is in a triangle. It is equivalent to the problem of listing $m$ triangles in an $m$-edge graph where $m=\tilde{O}(n^{1.5})$, and can be solved in $O(m^{1.41})$ time [Alon et al.'97] with the current matrix multiplication bounds, and in $\tilde{O}(m^{4/3})$ time if $ω=2$. We show that one can reduce Exact Triangle to All-Edges Sparse Triangle, showing that All-Edges Sparse Triangle (and hence Triangle Listing) requires $m^{4/3-o(1)}$ time also assuming the APSP hypothesis. This allows us to provide APSP-hardness for many dynamic problems that were previously known to be hard under the $3$SUM hypothesis. We also consider the previously studied All-Edges Monochromatic Triangle problem. Via work of [Lincoln et al.'20], our result on All-Edges Sparse Triangle implies that if the All-Edges Monochromatic Triangle problem has an $O(n^{2.5-ε})$ time algorithm for $ε>0$, then both the APSP and $3$SUM hypotheses are false. We also connect the problem to other ``intermediate'' problems, whose runtimes are between $O(n^ω)$ and $O(n^3)$, such as the Max-Min product problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

New Algorithms and Hardness for Incremental Single-Source Shortest Paths in Directed Graphs

In the dynamic Single-Source Shortest Paths (SSSP) problem, we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$ subject to edge insertions and deletions and a source vertex $s\in V$, and the goal is to maintain the distance $d(s,t)$ for all $t\in V$. Fine-grained complexity has provided strong lower bounds for exact partially dynamic SSSP and approximate fully dynamic SSSP [ESA'04, FOCS'14, STOC'15]. Thus much focus has been directed towards finding efficient partially dynamic $(1+ε)$-approximate SSSP algorithms [STOC'14, ICALP'15, SODA'14, FOCS'14, STOC'16, SODA'17, ICALP'17, ICALP'19, STOC'19, SODA'20, SODA'20]. Despite this rich literature, for directed graphs there are no known deterministic algorithms for $(1+ε)$-approximate dynamic SSSP that perform better than the classic ES-tree [JACM'81]. We present the first such algorithm. We present a \emph{deterministic} data structure for incremental SSSP in weighted digraphs with total update time $\tilde{O}(n^2 \log W)$ which is near-optimal for very dense graphs; here $W$ is the ratio of the largest weight in the graph to the smallest. Our algorithm also improves over the best known partially dynamic \emph{randomized} algorithm for directed SSSP by Henzinger et al. [STOC'14, ICALP'15] if $m=ω(n^{1.1})$. We also provide improved conditional lower bounds. Henzinger et al. [STOC'15] showed that under the OMv Hypothesis, the partially dynamic exact $s$-$t$ Shortest Path problem in undirected graphs requires amortized update or query time $m^{1/2-o(1)}$, given polynomial preprocessing time. Under a hypothesis about finding Cliques, we improve the update and query lower bound for algorithms with polynomial preprocessing time to $m^{0.626-o(1)}$. Further, under the $k$-Cycle hypothesis, we show that any partially dynamic SSSP algorithm with $O(m^{2-ε})$ preprocessing time requires amortized update or query time $m^{1-o(1)}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

New Techniques for Proving Fine-Grained Average-Case Hardness

The recent emergence of fine-grained cryptography strongly motivates developing an average-case analogue of Fine-Grained Complexity (FGC). This paper defines new versions of OV, $k$SUM and zero-$k$-clique that are both worst-case and average-case fine-grained hard assuming the core hypotheses of FGC. We then use these as a basis for fine-grained hardness and average-case hardness of other problems. The new problems represent their inputs in a certain ``factored'' form. We call them ``factored''-OV, ``factored''-zero-$k$-clique and ``factored''-$3$SUM. We show that factored-$k$-OV and factored $k$SUM are equivalent and are complete for a class of problems defined over Boolean functions. Factored zero-$k$-clique is also complete, for a different class of problems. Our hard factored problems are also simple enough that we can reduce them to many other problems, e.g.~to edit distance, $k$-LCS and versions of Max-Flow. We further consider counting variants of the factored problems and give WCtoACFG reductions for them for a natural distribution. Through FGC reductions we then get average-case hardness for well-studied problems like regular expression matching from standard worst-case FGC assumptions. To obtain our WCtoACFG reductions, we formalize the framework of [Boix-Adsera et al. 2019] that was used to give a WCtoACFG reduction for counting $k$-cliques. We define an explicit property of problems such that if a problem has that property one can use the framework on the problem to get a WCtoACFG self reduction. We then use the framework to slightly extend Boix-Adsera et al.'s average-case counting $k$-cliques result to average-case hardness for counting arbitrary subgraph patterns of constant size in $k$-partite graphs...

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Tight Hardness for Shortest Cycles and Paths in Sparse Graphs

Fine-grained reductions have established equivalences between many core problems with $\tilde{O}(n^3)$-time algorithms on $n$-node weighted graphs, such as Shortest Cycle, All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP), Radius, Replacement Paths, Second Shortest Paths, and so on. These problems also have $\tilde{O}(mn)$-time algorithms on $m$-edge $n$-node weighted graphs, and such algorithms have wider applicability. Are these $mn$ bounds optimal when $m \ll n^2$? Starting from the hypothesis that the minimum weight $(2\ell+1)$-Clique problem in edge weighted graphs requires $n^{2\ell+1-o(1)}$ time, we prove that for all sparsities of the form $m = Θ(n^{1+1/\ell})$, there is no $O(n^2 + mn^{1-ε})$ time algorithm for $ε>0$ for \emph{any} of the below problems: Minimum Weight $(2\ell+1)$-Cycle in a directed weighted graph, Shortest Cycle in a directed weighted graph, APSP in a directed or undirected weighted graph, Radius (or Eccentricities) in a directed or undirected weighted graph, Wiener index of a directed or undirected weighted graph, Replacement Paths in a directed weighted graph, Second Shortest Path in a directed weighted graph, Betweenness Centrality of a given node in a directed weighted graph. That is, we prove hardness for a variety of sparse graph problems from the hardness of a dense graph problem. Our results also lead to new conditional lower bounds from several related hypothesis for unweighted sparse graph problems including $k$-cycle, shortest cycle, Radius, Wiener index and APSP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Deterministic Time-Space Tradeoffs for k-SUM

Given a set of numbers, the $k$-SUM problem asks for a subset of $k$ numbers that sums to zero. When the numbers are integers, the time and space complexity of $k$-SUM is generally studied in the word-RAM model; when the numbers are reals, the complexity is studied in the real-RAM model, and space is measured by the number of reals held in memory at any point. We present a time and space efficient deterministic self-reduction for the $k$-SUM problem which holds for both models, and has many interesting consequences. To illustrate: * $3$-SUM is in deterministic time $O(n^2 \lg\lg(n)/\lg(n))$ and space $O\left(\sqrt{\frac{n \lg(n)}{\lg\lg(n)}}\right)$. In general, any polylogarithmic-time improvement over quadratic time for $3$-SUM can be converted into an algorithm with an identical time improvement but low space complexity as well. * $3$-SUM is in deterministic time $O(n^2)$ and space $O(\sqrt n)$, derandomizing an algorithm of Wang. * A popular conjecture states that 3-SUM requires $n^{2-o(1)}$ time on the word-RAM. We show that the 3-SUM Conjecture is in fact equivalent to the (seemingly weaker) conjecture that every $O(n^{.51})$-space algorithm for $3$-SUM requires at least $n^{2-o(1)}$ time on the word-RAM. * For $k \ge 4$, $k$-SUM is in deterministic $O(n^{k - 2 + 2/k})$ time and $O(\sqrt{n})$ space.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A 7/3-Approximation for Feedback Vertex Sets in Tournaments

We consider the minimum-weight feedback vertex set problem in tournaments: given a tournament with non-negative vertex weights, remove a minimum-weight set of vertices that intersects all cycles. This problem is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard to solve exactly, and Unique Games-hard to approximate by a factor better than 2. We present the first $7/3$ approximation algorithm for this problem, improving on the previously best known ratio $5/2$ given by Cai et al. [FOCS 1998, SICOMP 2001].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Approximation and Fixed Parameter Subquadratic Algorithms for Radius and Diameter

The radius and diameter are fundamental graph parameters. They are defined as the minimum and maximum of the eccentricities in a graph, respectively, where the eccentricity of a vertex is the largest distance from the vertex to another node. In directed graphs, there are several versions of these problems. For instance, one may choose to define the eccentricity of a node in terms of the largest distance into the node, out of the node, the sum of the two directions (i.e. roundtrip) and so on. All versions of diameter and radius can be solved via solving all-pairs shortest paths (APSP), followed by a fast postprocessing step. Solving APSP, however, on $n$-node graphs requires $Ω(n^2)$ time even in sparse graphs, as one needs to output $n^2$ distances. Motivated by known and new negative results on the impossibility of computing these measures exactly in general graphs in truly subquadratic time, under plausible assumptions, we search for \emph{approximation} and \emph{fixed parameter subquadratic} algorithms, and for reasons why they do not exist. Our results include: - Truly subquadratic approximation algorithms for most of the versions of Diameter and Radius with \emph{optimal} approximation guarantees (given truly subquadratic time), under plausible assumptions. In particular, there is a $2$-approximation algorithm for directed Radius with one-way distances that runs in $\tilde{O}(m\sqrt{n})$ time, while a $(2-δ)$-approximation algorithm in $O(n^{2-ε})$ time is unlikely. - On graphs with treewidth $k$, we can solve the problems in $2^{O(k\log{k})}n^{1+o(1)}$ time. We show that these algorithms are near optimal since even a $(3/2-δ)$-approximation algorithm that runs in time $2^{o(k)}n^{2-ε}$ would refute the plausible assumptions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

If the Current Clique Algorithms are Optimal, so is Valiant's Parser

The CFG recognition problem is: given a context-free grammar $\mathcal{G}$ and a string $w$ of length $n$, decide if $w$ can be obtained from $\mathcal{G}$. This is the most basic parsing question and is a core computer science problem. Valiant's parser from 1975 solves the problem in $O(n^ω)$ time, where $ω<2.373$ is the matrix multiplication exponent. Dozens of parsing algorithms have been proposed over the years, yet Valiant's upper bound remains unbeaten. The best combinatorial algorithms have mildly subcubic $O(n^3/\log^3{n})$ complexity. Lee (JACM'01) provided evidence that fast matrix multiplication is needed for CFG parsing, and that very efficient and practical algorithms might be hard or even impossible to obtain. Lee showed that any algorithm for a more general parsing problem with running time $O(|\mathcal{G}|\cdot n^{3-\varepsilon})$ can be converted into a surprising subcubic algorithm for Boolean Matrix Multiplication. Unfortunately, Lee's hardness result required that the grammar size be $|\mathcal{G}|=Ω(n^6)$. Nothing was known for the more relevant case of constant size grammars. In this work, we prove that any improvement on Valiant's algorithm, even for constant size grammars, either in terms of runtime or by avoiding the inefficiencies of fast matrix multiplication, would imply a breakthrough algorithm for the $k$-Clique problem: given a graph on $n$ nodes, decide if there are $k$ that form a clique. Besides classifying the complexity of a fundamental problem, our reduction has led us to similar lower bounds for more modern and well-studied cubic time problems for which faster algorithms are highly desirable in practice: RNA Folding, a central problem in computational biology, and Dyck Language Edit Distance, answering an open question of Saha (FOCS'14).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Quadratic-Time Hardness of LCS and other Sequence Similarity Measures

Two important similarity measures between sequences are the longest common subsequence (LCS) and the dynamic time warping distance (DTWD). The computations of these measures for two given sequences are central tasks in a variety of applications. Simple dynamic programming algorithms solve these tasks in $O(n^2)$ time, and despite an extensive amount of research, no algorithms with significantly better worst case upper bounds are known. In this paper, we show that an $O(n^{2-ε})$ time algorithm, for some $ε>0$, for computing the LCS or the DTWD of two sequences of length $n$ over a constant size alphabet, refutes the popular Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). Moreover, we show that computing the LCS of $k$ strings over an alphabet of size $O(k)$ cannot be done in $O(n^{k-ε})$ time, for any $ε>0$, under SETH. Finally, we also address the time complexity of approximating the DTWD of two strings in truly subquadratic time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Simulating Branching Programs with Edit Distance and Friends or: A Polylog Shaved is a Lower Bound Made

A recent and active line of work achieves tight lower bounds for fundamental problems under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). A celebrated result of Backurs and Indyk (STOC'15) proves that the Edit Distance of two sequences of length n cannot be computed in strongly subquadratic time under SETH. The result was extended by follow-up works to simpler looking problems like finding the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS). SETH is a very strong assumption, asserting that even linear size CNF formulas cannot be analyzed for satisfiability with an exponential speedup over exhaustive search. We consider much safer assumptions, e.g. that such a speedup is impossible for SAT on much more expressive representations, like NC circuits. Intuitively, this seems much more plausible: NC circuits can implement complex cryptographic primitives, while CNFs cannot even approximately compute an XOR of bits. Our main result is a surprising reduction from SAT on Branching Programs to fundamental problems in P like Edit Distance, LCS, and many others. Truly subquadratic algorithms for these problems therefore have consequences that we consider to be far more remarkable than merely faster CNF SAT algorithms. For example, SAT on arbitrary o(n)-depth bounded fan-in circuits (and therefore also NC-Circuit-SAT) can be solved in (2-eps)^n time. A very interesting feature of our work is that we can prove major consequences even from mildly subquadratic algorithms for Edit Distance or LCS. For example, we show that if we can shave an arbitrarily large polylog factor from n^2 for Edit Distance then NEXP does not have non-uniform NC^1 circuits. A more fine-grained examination shows that even shaving a $\log^c{n}$ factor, for a specific constant $c \approx 10^3$, already implies new circuit lower bounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Subtree Isomorphism Revisited

The Subtree Isomorphism problem asks whether a given tree is contained in another given tree. The problem is of fundamental importance and has been studied since the 1960s. For some variants, e.g., ordered trees, near-linear time algorithms are known, but for the general case truly subquadratic algorithms remain elusive. Our first result is a reduction from the Orthogonal Vectors problem to Subtree Isomorphism, showing that a truly subquadratic algorithm for the latter refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). In light of this conditional lower bound, we focus on natural special cases for which no truly subquadratic algorithms are known. We classify these cases against the quadratic barrier, showing in particular that: -- Even for binary, rooted trees, a truly subquadratic algorithm refutes SETH. -- Even for rooted trees of depth $O(\log\log{n})$, where $n$ is the total number of vertices, a truly subquadratic algorithm refutes SETH. -- For every constant $d$, there is a constant $ε_d>0$ and a randomized, truly subquadratic algorithm for degree-$d$ rooted trees of depth at most $(1+ ε_d) \log_{d}{n}$. In particular, there is an $O(\min\{ 2.85^h ,n^2 \})$ algorithm for binary trees of depth $h$. Our reductions utilize new "tree gadgets" that are likely useful for future SETH-based lower bounds for problems on trees. Our upper bounds apply a folklore result from randomized decision tree complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Popular conjectures imply strong lower bounds for dynamic problems

We consider several well-studied problems in dynamic algorithms and prove that sufficient progress on any of them would imply a breakthrough on one of five major open problems in the theory of algorithms: 1. Is the 3SUM problem on $n$ numbers in $O(n^{2-ε})$ time for some $ε>0$? 2. Can one determine the satisfiability of a CNF formula on $n$ variables in $O((2-ε)^n poly n)$ time for some $ε>0$? 3. Is the All Pairs Shortest Paths problem for graphs on $n$ vertices in $O(n^{3-ε})$ time for some $ε>0$? 4. Is there a linear time algorithm that detects whether a given graph contains a triangle? 5. Is there an $O(n^{3-ε})$ time combinatorial algorithm for $n\times n$ Boolean matrix multiplication? The problems we consider include dynamic versions of bipartite perfect matching, bipartite maximum weight matching, single source reachability, single source shortest paths, strong connectivity, subgraph connectivity, diameter approximation and some nongraph problems such as Pagh's problem defined in a recent paper by Patrascu [STOC 2010].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Quantum algorithms for shortest paths problems in structured instances

We consider the quantum time complexity of the all pairs shortest paths (APSP) problem and some of its variants. The trivial classical algorithm for APSP and most all pairs path problems runs in $O(n^3)$ time, while the trivial algorithm in the quantum setting runs in $\tilde{O}(n^{2.5})$ time, using Grover search. A major open problem in classical algorithms is to obtain a truly subcubic time algorithm for APSP, i.e. an algorithm running in $O(n^{3-\varepsilon})$ time for constant $\varepsilon>0$. To approach this problem, many truly subcubic time classical algorithms have been devised for APSP and its variants for structured inputs. Some examples of such problems are APSP in geometrically weighted graphs, graphs with small integer edge weights or a small number of weights incident to each vertex, and the all pairs earliest arrivals problem. In this paper we revisit these problems in the quantum setting and obtain the first nontrivial (i.e. $O(n^{2.5-\varepsilon})$ time) quantum algorithms for the problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Approximating the diameter of a graph

In this paper we consider the fundamental problem of approximating the diameter $D$ of directed or undirected graphs. In a seminal paper, Aingworth, Chekuri, Indyk and Motwani [SIAM J. Comput. 1999] presented an algorithm that computes in $\Ot(m\sqrt n + n^2)$ time an estimate $\hat{D}$ for the diameter of an $n$-node, $m$-edge graph, such that $\lfloor 2/3 D \rfloor \leq \hat{D} \leq D$. In this paper we present an algorithm that produces the same estimate in $\Ot(m\sqrt n)$ expected running time. We then provide strong evidence that a better approximation may be hard to obtain if we insist on an $O(m^{2-\eps})$ running time. In particular, we show that if there is some constant $\eps>0$ so that there is an algorithm for undirected unweighted graphs that runs in $O(m^{2-\eps})$ time and produces an approximation $\hat{D}$ such that $ (2/3+\eps) D \leq \hat{D} \leq D$, then SAT for CNF formulas on $n$ variables can be solved in $O^{*}((2-δ)^{n})$ time for some constant $δ>0$, and the strong exponential time hypothesis of [Impagliazzo, Paturi, Zane JCSS'01] is false. Motivated by this somewhat negative result, we study whether it is possible to obtain a better approximation for specific cases. For unweighted directed or undirected graphs, we show that if $D=3h+z$, where $h\geq 0$ and $z\in {0,1,2}$, then it is possible to report in $\tilde{O}(\min{m^{2/3} n^{4/3},m^{2-1/(2h+3)}})$ time an estimate $\hat{D}$ such that $2h+z \leq \hat{D}\leq D$, thus giving a better than 3/2 approximation whenever $z\neq 0$. This is significant for constant values of $D$ which is exactly when the diameter approximation problem is hardest to solve. For the case of unweighted undirected graphs we present an $\tilde{O}(m^{2/3} n^{4/3})$ time algorithm that reports an estimate $\hat{D}$ such that $\lfloor 4D/5\rfloor \leq \hat{D}\leq D$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Minimum Weight Cycles and Triangles: Equivalences and Algorithms

We consider the fundamental algorithmic problem of finding a cycle of minimum weight in a weighted graph. In particular, we show that the minimum weight cycle problem in an undirected n-node graph with edge weights in {1,...,M} or in a directed n-node graph with edge weights in {-M,..., M} and no negative cycles can be efficiently reduced to finding a minimum weight triangle in an Theta(n)-node undirected graph with weights in {1,...,O(M)}. Roughly speaking, our reductions imply the following surprising phenomenon: a minimum cycle with an arbitrary number of weighted edges can be "encoded" using only three edges within roughly the same weight interval! This resolves a longstanding open problem posed by Itai and Rodeh [SIAM J. Computing 1978 and STOC'77]. A direct consequence of our efficient reductions are O (Mn^{omega})-time algorithms using fast matrix multiplication (FMM) for finding a minimum weight cycle in both undirected graphs with integral weights from the interval [1,M] and directed graphs with integral weights from the interval [-M,M]. The latter seems to reveal a strong separation between the all pairs shortest paths (APSP) problem and the minimum weight cycle problem in directed graphs as the fastest known APSP algorithm has a running time of O(M^{0.681}n^{2.575}) by Zwick [J. ACM 2002]. In contrast, when only combinatorial algorithms are allowed (that is, without FMM) the only known solution to minimum weight cycle is by computing APSP. Interestingly, any separation between the two problems in this case would be an amazing breakthrough as by a recent paper by Vassilevska W. and Williams [FOCS'10], any O(n^{3-eps})-time algorithm (eps>0) for minimum weight cycle immediately implies a O(n^{3-delta})-time algorithm (delta>0) for APSP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Faster Replacement Paths

The replacement paths problem for directed graphs is to find for given nodes s and t and every edge e on the shortest path between them, the shortest path between s and t which avoids e. For unweighted directed graphs on n vertices, the best known algorithm runtime was \tilde{O}(n^{2.5}) by Roditty and Zwick. For graphs with integer weights in {-M,...,M}, Weimann and Yuster recently showed that one can use fast matrix multiplication and solve the problem in O(Mn^{2.584}) time, a runtime which would be O(Mn^{2.33}) if the exponent ωof matrix multiplication is 2. We improve both of these algorithms. Our new algorithm also relies on fast matrix multiplication and runs in O(M n^ω polylog(n)) time if ω>2 and O(n^{2+\eps}) for any \eps>0 if ω=2. Our result shows that, at least for small integer weights, the replacement paths problem in directed graphs may be easier than the related all pairs shortest paths problem in directed graphs, as the current best runtime for the latter is Ω(n^{2.5}) time even if ω=2.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access