Source author record

Alexander Kozachinskiy

Alexander Kozachinskiy appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

9works
9topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Constant-Depth Sorting Networks

In this paper, we address sorting networks that are constructed from comparators of arity $k > 2$. That is, in our setting the arity of the comparators -- or, in other words, the number of inputs that can be sorted at the unit cost -- is a parameter. We study its relationship with two other parameters -- $n$, the number of inputs, and $d$, the depth. This model received considerable attention. Partly, its motivation is to better understand the structure of sorting networks. In particular, sorting networks with large arity are related to recursive constructions of ordinary sorting networks. Additionally, studies of this model have natural correspondence with a recent line of work on constructing circuits for majority functions from majority gates of lower fan-in. Motivated by these questions, we obtain the first lower bounds on the arity of constant-depth sorting networks. More precisely, we consider sorting networks of depth $d$ up to 4, and determine the minimal $k$ for which there is such a network with comparators of arity $k$. For depths $d=1,2$ we observe that $k=n$. For $d=3$ we show that $k = \lceil \frac n2 \rceil$. For $d=4$ the minimal arity becomes sublinear: $k = Θ(n^{2/3})$. This contrasts with the case of majority circuits, in which $k = O(n^{2/3})$ is achievable already for depth $d=3$.

preprint2022arXiv

Energy Games over Totally Ordered Groups

Kopczyński (ICALP 2006) conjectured that prefix-independent half-positional winning conditions are closed under finite unions. We refute this conjecture over finite arenas. For that, we introduce a new class of prefix-independent bi-positional winning conditions called energy conditions over totally ordered groups. We give an example of two such conditions whose union is not half-positional. We also conjecture that every prefix-independent bi-positional winning condition coincides with some energy condition over a totally ordered group on periodic sequences.

preprint2022arXiv

New Bounds for the Flock-of-Birds Problem

In this paper, we continue a line of work on obtaining succinct population protocols for Presburger-definable predicates. More specifically, we focus on threshold predicates. These are predicates of the form $n\ge d$, where $n$ is a free variable and $d$ is a constant. For every $d$, we establish a 1-aware population protocol for this predicate with $\log_2 d + \min\{e, z\} + O(1)$ states, where $e$ (resp., $z$) is the number of $1$'s (resp., $0$'s) in the binary representation of $d$ (resp., $d - 1$). This improves upon an upper bound $4\log_2 d + O(1)$ due to Blondin et al. We also show that any 1-aware protocol for our problem must have at least $\log_2(d)$ states. This improves upon a lower bound $\log_3 d$ due to Blondin et al.

preprint2022arXiv

State Complexity of Chromatic Memory in Infinite-Duration Games

A major open problem in the area of infinite-duration games is to characterize winning conditions that are determined in finite-memory strategies. Infinite-duration games are usually studied over edge-colored graphs, with winning conditions that are defined in terms of sequences of colors. In this paper, we investigate a restricted class of finite-memory strategies called chromatic finite-memory strategies. While general finite-memory strategies operate with sequences of edges of a game graph, chromatic finite-memory strategies observe only colors of these edges. Recent results in this area show that studying finite-memory determinacy is more tractable when we restrict ourselves to chromatic strategies. On the other hand, as was shown by Le Roux (CiE 2020), determinacy in general finite-memory strategies implies determinacy in chromatic finite-memory strategies. Unfortunately, this result is quite inefficient in terms of the state complexity: to replace a winning strategy with few states of general memory, we might need much more states of chromatic memory. The goal of the present paper is to find out the exact state complexity of this transformation. For every winning condition and for every game graph with $n$ nodes we show the following: if this game graph has a winning strategy with $q$ states of general memory, then it also has a winning strategy with $(q + 1)^n$ states of chromatic memory. We also show that this bound is almost tight. For every $q$ and $n$, we construct a winning condition and a game graph with $n + O(1)$ nodes, where one can win with $q$ states of general memory, but not with $q^n - 1$ states of chromatic memory.

preprint2020arXiv

Automatic Kolmogorov complexity, normality and finite state dimension revisited

It is well known that normality can be described as incompressibility via finite automata. Still the statement and the proof of this result as given by Becher and Heiber (2013) in terms of "lossless finite-state compressors" do not follow the standard scheme of Kolmogorov complexity definition (an automaton is used for compression, not decompression). We modify this approach to make it more similar to the traditional Kolmogorov complexity theory (and simpler) by explicitly defining the notion of automatic Kolmogorov complexity and using its simple properties. Using this characterization and a sufficient condition for normality in terms of Kolmogorov complexity derived from it, we provide easy proofs for classical results about normal sequences (Champernown, Wall, Piatetski-Shapiro, Besicovitch, Copeland, Erdos et al.) Then we extend this approach to finite state dimension. We show that the block entropy definition of the finite state dimension remains the same if non-aligned blocks are used. Then we provide equivalent definitions in terms of automatic complexity, superadditive bounds for Kolmogorov complexity, calibrated superadditive functions and finite state a priori probability and use them to give simple proofs for known results about finite state dimension, and for Agafonov's result saying that normality is preserved by automatic selection rules as well as the results of Schnorr and Stimm that relate normality to finite state martingales. Some results of this paper were presented at the Fundamentals in Computing Theory conferences in 2017 and 2019. Preliminary version of this paper (that does not mention the finite state dimension) was published in arxiv in~2017 (see the previous version of this submission).

preprint2020arXiv

Multiparty Karchmer-Wigderson Games and Threshold Circuits

We suggest a generalization of Karchmer-Wigderson communication games to the multiparty setting. Our generalization turns out to be tightly connected to circuits consisting of threshold gates. This allows us to obtain new explicit constructions of such circuits for several functions. In particular, we provide an explicit (polynomial-time computable) log-depth monotone formula for Majority function, consisting only of 3-bit majority gates and variables. This resolves a conjecture of Cohen et al. (CRYPTO 2013).

preprint2015arXiv

On Slepian--Wolf Theorem with Interaction

In this paper we study interactive "one-shot" analogues of the classical Slepian-Wolf theorem. Alice receives a value of a random variable $X$, Bob receives a value of another random variable $Y$ that is jointly distributed with $X$. Alice's goal is to transmit $X$ to Bob (with some error probability $\varepsilon$). Instead of one-way transmission, which is studied in the classical coding theory, we allow them to interact. They may also use shared randomness. We show, that Alice can transmit $X$ to Bob in expected $H(X|Y) + 2\sqrt{H(X|Y)} + O(\log_2\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right))$ number of bits. Moreover, we show that every one-round protocol $π$ with information complexity $I$ can be compressed to the (many-round) protocol with expected communication about $I + 2\sqrt{I}$ bits. This improves a result by Braverman and Rao \cite{braverman2011information}, where they had $5\sqrt{I}$. Further, we show how to solve this problem (transmitting $X$) using $3H(X|Y) + O(\log_2\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right))$ bits and $4$ rounds on average. This improves a result of~\cite{brody2013towards}, where they had $4H(X|Y) + O(\log1/\varepsilon)$ bits and 10 rounds on average. In the end of the paper we discuss how many bits Alice and Bob may need to communicate on average besides $H(X|Y)$. The main question is whether the upper bounds mentioned above are tight. We provide an example of $(X, Y)$, such that transmission of $X$ from Alice to Bob with error probability $\varepsilon$ requires $H(X|Y) + Ω\left(\log_2\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)$ bits on average.

preprint2015arXiv

Some Bounds on Communication Complexity of Gap Hamming Distance

In this paper we obtain some bounds on communication complexity of Gap Hamming Distance problem ($\mathsf{GHD}^n_{L, U}$): Alice and Bob are given binary string of length $n$ and they are guaranteed that Hamming distance between their inputs is either $\le L$ or $\ge U$ for some $L < U$. They have to output 0, if the first inequality holds, and 1, if the second inequality holds. In this paper we study the communication complexity of $\mathsf{GHD}^n_{L, U}$ for probabilistic protocols with one-sided error and for deterministic protocols. Our first result is a protocol which communicates $O\left(\left(\frac{s}{U}\right)^\frac{1}{3} \cdot n\log n\right)$ bits and has one-sided error probability $e^{-s}$ provided $s \ge \frac{(L + \frac{10}{n})^3}{U^2}$. Our second result is about deterministic communication complexity of $\mathsf{GHD}^n_{0,\, t}$. Surprisingly, it can be computed with logarithmic precision: $$\mathrm{D}(\mathsf{GHD}^n_{0,\, t}) = n - \log_2 V_2\left(n, \left\lfloor\frac{t}{2}\right\rfloor\right) + O(\log n),$$ where $V_2(n, r)$ denotes the size of Hamming ball of radius $r$. As an application of this result for every $c < 2$ we prove a $Ω\left(\frac{n(2 - c)^2}{p}\right)$ lower bound on the space complexity of any $c$-approximate deterministic $p$-pass streaming algorithm for computing the number of distinct elements in a data stream of length $n$ with tokens drawn from the universe $U = \{1, 2, \ldots, n\}$. Previously that lower bound was known for $c < \frac{3}{2}$ and for $c < 2$ but with larger $|U|$.