Paper detail

On Slepian--Wolf Theorem with Interaction

In this paper we study interactive "one-shot" analogues of the classical Slepian-Wolf theorem. Alice receives a value of a random variable $X$, Bob receives a value of another random variable $Y$ that is jointly distributed with $X$. Alice's goal is to transmit $X$ to Bob (with some error probability $\varepsilon$). Instead of one-way transmission, which is studied in the classical coding theory, we allow them to interact. They may also use shared randomness. We show, that Alice can transmit $X$ to Bob in expected $H(X|Y) + 2\sqrt{H(X|Y)} + O(\log_2\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right))$ number of bits. Moreover, we show that every one-round protocol $π$ with information complexity $I$ can be compressed to the (many-round) protocol with expected communication about $I + 2\sqrt{I}$ bits. This improves a result by Braverman and Rao \cite{braverman2011information}, where they had $5\sqrt{I}$. Further, we show how to solve this problem (transmitting $X$) using $3H(X|Y) + O(\log_2\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right))$ bits and $4$ rounds on average. This improves a result of~\cite{brody2013towards}, where they had $4H(X|Y) + O(\log1/\varepsilon)$ bits and 10 rounds on average. In the end of the paper we discuss how many bits Alice and Bob may need to communicate on average besides $H(X|Y)$. The main question is whether the upper bounds mentioned above are tight. We provide an example of $(X, Y)$, such that transmission of $X$ from Alice to Bob with error probability $\varepsilon$ requires $H(X|Y) + Ω\left(\log_2\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)$ bits on average.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.