Source author record

Alexander Kemarsky

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

7works
1topics
3close collaborators

Published work

7 publications

preprint2015arXiv

A New Bound for the Uniform Admissibility Theorem

In "All p-adic reductive groups are tame" Bernstein proved that for a reductive group G over a local non-archimedean field F and a compact open subgroup K of G there exists a uniform bound N(G,K) such that for every irreducible, smooth, and admissible representation V of G the dimension of the subspace of K-fixed vectors in V is bounded by N(G,K). In this note I repeat the proof of Bernstein and give my proof to one of the two main lemmas. The new proof of this lemma gives a new, sharper bound for the constant N(G,K).

preprint2015arXiv

Gamma Factors of Distinguished Representations of GL_n(C)

Let (π,V)(π,V) be a GLn(R)GL_n(\mathbb{R})-distinguished, irreducible, admissible representation of GLn(C)GL_n(\mathbb{C}), let π′π' be an irreducible, admissible, GLm(R)GL_m(\mathbb{R})-distinguished representation of GLm(C)GL_m(\mathbb{C}), and let ψψ be a non-trival character of C\mathbb{C} which is trivial on R\mathbb{R}. We prove that Rankin-Selberg gamma factor at s=12s=\frac{1}{2} is γ(12,π×π′;ψ)=1γ(\frac{1}{2},π\times π'; ψ) = 1. The result follows as a simple consequence from the characterisation of GLn(R)GL_n(\mathbb{R})-distinguished representations in terms of their Langlands data.

preprint2015arXiv

z-Finite distributions on p-adic groups

For a real reductive group G, the center z(U(g))\mathfrak{z}(\mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})) of the universal enveloping algebra of the Lie algebra g\mathfrak{g} of G acts on the space of distributions on G. This action proved to be very useful (see e.g. [HC63, HC65, Sha74, Bar03]). Over non-Archimedean local fields, one can replace this action by the action of the Bernstein center z of G, i.e. the center of the category of smooth representations. However, this action is not well studied. In this paper we provide some tools to work with this action and prove the following results. 1) The wave-front set of any z-finite distribution on G over any point g∈Gg\in G lies inside the nilpotent cone of Tg∗G≅gT_g^*G \cong \mathfrak{g}. 2) Let H1,H2⊂GH_1,H_2 \subset G be symmetric subgroups. Consider the space J of H1×H2H_1\times H_2-invariant distributions on G. We prove that the z-finite distributions in J form a dense subspace. In fact we prove this result in wider generality, where the groups HiH_i are spherical groups of certain type and the invariance condition is replaced by equivariance. Further we apply those results to density and regularity of spherical characters. The first result can be viewed as a version of Howe's expansion of characters. The second result can be viewed as a spherical space analog of a classical theorem on density of characters of admissible representations. It can also be viewed as a spectral version of Bernstein's localization principle. In the Archimedean case, the first result is well-known and the second remains open.

preprint2014arXiv

A note on Kirillov model for representations of GLn(C){GL}_n(\mathbb{C})

Let G=GLn(C)G=GL_{n}(\mathbb{C}) and 1≠ψ:C→C×1\neψ:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}^{\times} be an additive character. Let UU be the subgroup of upper triangular unipotent matrices in GG. Denote by θθ the character θ:U→Cθ:U\to\mathbb{C} given by θ(u):=ψ(u1,2+u2,3+...+un−1,n). θ(u):=ψ(u_{1,2}+u_{2,3}+...+u_{n-1,n}). Let PP be the mirabolic subgroup of GG consisting of all matrices in GG with the last row equal to (0,0,...,0,1)(0,0,...,0,1). We prove that if ππ is an irreducible generic representation of GLn(C)GL_{n}(\mathbb{C}) and W(π,ψ)\mathcal{W}(π,ψ) is its Whittaker model, then the space {f∣P:P→C: f∈W(π,ψ)}\{f|_{P}:P\to \mathbb{C}:\, f\in \mathcal{W}(π,ψ)\} contains the space of infinitely differentiable functions f:P→Cf:P\to \mathbb{C} which satisfy f(up)=ψ(u)f(p)f(up)=ψ(u)f(p) for all u∈Uu\in U and p∈Pp\in P and which have a compact support modulo UU. A similar result was proven for GLn(F)GL_{n}(F), where FF is a pp-adic field by Gelfand and Kazhdan in "Representations of the group GL(n,K)GL(n,K) where K is a local field", Lie groups and their representations, Proc. Summer School, Bolyai János Math. Soc., Budapest:95-118, 1975, and for GLn(R)GL_{n}(\mathbb{R}) by Jacquet in "Distinction by the quasi-split unitary group", Israel Journal of Mathematics, 178(1):269-324, 2010.

preprint2012arXiv

Irreducible representations of product of real reductive groups

Let G1,G2G_1,G_2 be real reductive groups and (π,V)(π,V) a smooth, irreducible, admissible representation of G1×G2G_1 \times G_2. We prove that (π,V)(π,V) is the completed tensor product of (πi,Vi)(π_i,V_i), i=1,2i=1,2, where (πi,Vi)(π_i,V_i) is a smooth,irreducible,admissible representation of GiG_i, i=1,2i=1,2. We deduce this from the analogous theorem for Harish-Chandra modules, for which one direction was proven in [AG] and the other direction we prove here. As a corollary, we deduce that strong Gelfand property for a pair H⊂GH \subset G of real reductive groups is equivalent to the usual Gelfand property of the pair ΔH⊂G×HΔH \subset G \times H.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.