Paper detail

A note on Kirillov model for representations of ${GL}_n(\mathbb{C})$

Let $G=GL_{n}(\mathbb{C})$ and $1\neψ:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}^{\times}$ be an additive character. Let $U$ be the subgroup of upper triangular unipotent matrices in $G$. Denote by $θ$ the character $θ:U\to\mathbb{C}$ given by \[ θ(u):=ψ(u_{1,2}+u_{2,3}+...+u_{n-1,n}). \] Let $P$ be the mirabolic subgroup of $G$ consisting of all matrices in $G$ with the last row equal to $(0,0,...,0,1)$. We prove that if $π$ is an irreducible generic representation of $GL_{n}(\mathbb{C})$ and $\mathcal{W}(π,ψ)$ is its Whittaker model, then the space $\{f|_{P}:P\to \mathbb{C}:\, f\in \mathcal{W}(π,ψ)\}$ contains the space of infinitely differentiable functions $f:P\to \mathbb{C}$ which satisfy $f(up)=ψ(u)f(p)$ for all $u\in U$ and $p\in P$ and which have a compact support modulo $U$. A similar result was proven for $GL_{n}(F)$, where $F$ is a $p$-adic field by Gelfand and Kazhdan in "Representations of the group $GL(n,K)$ where K is a local field", Lie groups and their representations, Proc. Summer School, Bolyai János Math. Soc., Budapest:95-118, 1975, and for $GL_{n}(\mathbb{R})$ by Jacquet in "Distinction by the quasi-split unitary group", Israel Journal of Mathematics, 178(1):269-324, 2010.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.