BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Adel Daoud

Adel Daoud contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
econ.GNq-fin.ECMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceComputation and Languagecs.CYecon.EMMethodologystat.OT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
9topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Beyond Interaction Effects: Two Logics for Studying Population Inequalities

When sociologists and other social scientist ask whether the return to college differs by race and gender, they face a choice between two fundamentally different modes of inquiry. Traditional interaction models follow deductive logic: the researcher specifies which variables moderate effects and tests these hypotheses. Machine learning methods follow inductive logic: algorithms search across vast combinatorial spaces to discover patterns of heterogeneity. This article develops a framework for navigating between these approaches. We show that the choice between deduction and induction reflects a tradeoff between interpretability and flexibility, and we demonstrate through simulation when each approach excels. Our framework is particularly relevant for inequality research, where understanding how treatment effects vary across intersecting social subpopulation is substantively central.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2025arXiv

Detecting and Mitigating Treatment Leakage in Text-Based Causal Inference: Distillation and Sensitivity Analysis

Text-based causal inference increasingly employs textual data as proxies for unobserved confounders, yet this approach introduces a previously undertheorized source of bias: treatment leakage. Treatment leakage occurs when text intended to capture confounding information also contains signals predictive of treatment status, thereby inducing post-treatment bias in causal estimates. Critically, this problem can arise even when documents precede treatment assignment, as authors may employ future-referencing language that anticipates subsequent interventions. Despite growing recognition of this issue, no systematic methods exist for identifying and mitigating treatment leakage in text-as-confounder applications. This paper addresses this gap through three contributions. First, we provide formal statistical and set-theoretic definitions of treatment leakage that clarify when and why bias occurs. Second, we propose four text distillation methods -- similarity-based passage removal, distant supervision classification, salient feature removal, and iterative nullspace projection -- designed to eliminate treatment-predictive content while preserving confounder information. Third, we validate these methods through simulations using synthetic text and an empirical application examining International Monetary Fund structural adjustment programs and child mortality. Our findings indicate that moderate distillation optimally balances bias reduction against confounder retention, whereas overly stringent approaches degrade estimate precision.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Personalized Public Policy Analysis in Social Sciences using Causal-Graphical Normalizing Flows

Structural Equation/Causal Models (SEMs/SCMs) are widely used in epidemiology and social sciences to identify and analyze the average causal effect (ACE) and conditional ACE (CACE). Traditional causal effect estimation methods such as Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) and more recently Regression-With-Residuals (RWR) are widely used - as they avoid the challenging task of identifying the SCM parameters - to estimate ACE and CACE. However, much work remains before traditional estimation methods can be used for counterfactual inference, and for the benefit of Personalized Public Policy Analysis (P$^3$A) in the social sciences. While doctors rely on personalized medicine to tailor treatments to patients in laboratory settings (relatively closed systems), P$^3$A draws inspiration from such tailoring but adapts it for open social systems. In this article, we develop a method for counterfactual inference that we name causal-Graphical Normalizing Flow (c-GNF), facilitating P$^3$A. First, we show how c-GNF captures the underlying SCM without making any assumption about functional forms. Second, we propose a novel dequantization trick to deal with discrete variables, which is a limitation of normalizing flows in general. Third, we demonstrate in experiments that c-GNF performs on-par with IPW and RWR in terms of bias and variance for estimating the ATE, when the true functional forms are known, and better when they are unknown. Fourth and most importantly, we conduct counterfactual inference with c-GNFs, demonstrating promising empirical performance. Because IPW and RWR, like other traditional methods, lack the capability of counterfactual inference, c-GNFs will likely play a major role in tailoring personalized treatment, facilitating P$^3$A, optimizing social interventions - in contrast to the current `one-size-fits-all' approach of existing methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

To What Extent Do Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Mediate Social Assistance Dependency? Evidence from Sweden

Occasional social assistance prevents individuals from a range of social ills, particularly unemployment and poverty. It remains unclear, however, how and to what extent continued reliance on social assistance leads to individuals becoming trapped in social assistance dependency. In this paper, we build on the theory of cumulative disadvantage and examine whether the accumulated use of social assistance over the life course is associated with an increased risk of future social assistance recipiency. We also analyze the extent to which living in disadvantaged neighborhoods constitutes an important mechanism in the explanation of this association. Our analyses use Swedish population registers for the full population of individuals born in 1981, and these individuals are followed for approximately 17 years. While most studies are limited by a lack of granular, life-history data, our granular individual-level data allow us to apply causal-mediation analysis, and thereby quantify the extent to which the likelihood of ending up in social assistance dependency is affected by residing in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Our findings show the accumulation of social assistance over the studied period is associated with a more than four-fold increase on a risk ratio scale for future social assistance recipiency, compared to never having received social assistance during the period examined. Then, we examine how social assistance dependency is mediated by prolonged exposure to disadvantaged neighborhoods. Our results suggest that the indirect effect of disadvantaged neighborhoods is weak to moderate. Therefore, social assistance dependency may be a multilevel process. Future research is to explore how the mediating effects of disadvantaged neighborhoods vary in different contexts.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The International Monetary Funds intervention in education systems and its impact on childrens chances of completing school

Enabling children to acquire an education is one of the most effective means to reduce inequality, poverty, and ill-health globally. While in normal times a government controls its educational policies, during times of macroeconomic instability, that control may shift to supporting international organizations, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF). While much research has focused on which sectors has been affected by IMF policies, scholars have devoted little attention to the policy content of IMF interventions affecting the education sector and childrens education outcomes: denoted IMF education policies. This article evaluates the extent which IMF education policies exist in all programs and how these policies and IMF programs affect childrens likelihood of completing schools. While IMF education policies have a small adverse effect yet statistically insignificant on childrens probability of completing school, these policies moderate effect heterogeneity for IMF programs. The effect of IMF programs (joint set of policies) adversely effect childrens chances of completing school by six percentage points. By analyzing how IMF-education policies but also how IMF programs affect the education sector in low and middle-income countries, scholars will gain a deeper understanding of how such policies will likely affect downstream outcomes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The wealth of nations and the health of populations: A quasi-experimental design of the impact of sovereign debt crises on child mortality

The wealth of nations and the health of populations are intimately strongly associated, yet the extent to which economic prosperity (GDP per capita) causes improved health remains disputed. The purpose of this article is to analyze the impact of sovereign debt crises (SDC) on child mortality, using a sample of 57 low- and middle-income countries surveyed by the Demographic and Health Survey between the years 1990 and 2015. These surveys supply 229 household data and containing about 3 million childbirth history records. This focus on SDC instead of GDP provides a quasi-experimental moment in which the influence of unobserved confounding is less than a moment analyzing the normal fluctuations of GDP. This study measures child mortality at six thresholds: neonatal, under-one (infant), under-two, under-three, under-four, and under-five mortality. Using a machine-learning (ML) model for causal inference, this study finds that while an SDC causes an adverse yet statistically insignificant effect on neonatal mortality, all other child mortality group samples are adversely affected between a probability of 0.12 to 0.14 (all statistically significant at the 95-percent threshold). Through this ML, this study also finds that the most important treatment heterogeneity moderator, in the entire adjustment set, is whether a child is born in a low-income country.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access