Paper detail

To What Extent Do Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Mediate Social Assistance Dependency? Evidence from Sweden

Occasional social assistance prevents individuals from a range of social ills, particularly unemployment and poverty. It remains unclear, however, how and to what extent continued reliance on social assistance leads to individuals becoming trapped in social assistance dependency. In this paper, we build on the theory of cumulative disadvantage and examine whether the accumulated use of social assistance over the life course is associated with an increased risk of future social assistance recipiency. We also analyze the extent to which living in disadvantaged neighborhoods constitutes an important mechanism in the explanation of this association. Our analyses use Swedish population registers for the full population of individuals born in 1981, and these individuals are followed for approximately 17 years. While most studies are limited by a lack of granular, life-history data, our granular individual-level data allow us to apply causal-mediation analysis, and thereby quantify the extent to which the likelihood of ending up in social assistance dependency is affected by residing in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Our findings show the accumulation of social assistance over the studied period is associated with a more than four-fold increase on a risk ratio scale for future social assistance recipiency, compared to never having received social assistance during the period examined. Then, we examine how social assistance dependency is mediated by prolonged exposure to disadvantaged neighborhoods. Our results suggest that the indirect effect of disadvantaged neighborhoods is weak to moderate. Therefore, social assistance dependency may be a multilevel process. Future research is to explore how the mediating effects of disadvantaged neighborhoods vary in different contexts.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.