Paper detail

X-SYNTH: Beyond Retrieval -- Enterprise Context Synthesis from Observed Human Attention

In enterprise operations, the context required for an AI agent task is scattered across systems of record, static information stores, and communication channels. What is stored is system state, a lossy representation of the work that actually happened [2, 52]. The prevailing approach [17, 31, 34, 36] retrieves by matching request content to what is stored; for narrow requests this works well. But synthesis quality depends on knowing what to surface and how to interpret it: knowledge specific to each organization, team, and individual [5, 57, 61], present in behavioral patterns, absent from any retrieval index. For complex agentic tasks it breaks down: True Lead Rate is low, False Lead Rate is high, and the model has no mechanism to improve. We present X-SYNTH, a framework for enterprise context synthesis grounded in human attention, the digitally observable interaction signatures of each worker, encoding not just what they did but the sequence in which they did it, along with implicit reward signals. Behavioral traces preceding positive outcomes are distinguishable from those that did not, without external labeling. X-SYNTH models each individual's behavioral baseline as a Digital Twin Signature (DTS) and selects among seven qualitatively distinct attention filters: Proportional, Inverse, Differential, Recurrent, Comparative, Sequential, and Collective, per individual and per query, to identify causally relevant activity signatures. A four-stage pipeline assembles ranked context grounded in behavioral patterns rather than query embeddings. On a sales lead identification task, a frontier model unaided achieves 9.5% True Lead Rate (TLR) with 90.5% False Lead Rate (FLR). Augmented with X-SYNTH, TLR rises to 61.9% (6.5x) while FLR falls to 18.8%. Enterprise context synthesis is not a retrieval problem. It is a relevance problem, and human attention is its most reliable ground truth.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.