Paper detail

White-box Membership Attack Against Machine Learning Based Retinopathy Classification

The advances in machine learning (ML) have greatly improved AI-based diagnosis aid systems in medical imaging. However, being based on collecting medical data specific to individuals induces several security issues, especially in terms of privacy. Even though the owner of the images like a hospital put in place strict privacy protection provisions at the level of its information system, the model trained over his images still holds disclosure potential. The trained model may be accessible to an attacker as: 1) White-box: accessing to the model architecture and parameters; 2) Black box: where he can only query the model with his own inputs through an appropriate interface. Existing attack methods include: feature estimation attacks (FEA), membership inference attack (MIA), model memorization attack (MMA) and identification attacks (IA). In this work we focus on MIA against a model that has been trained to detect diabetic retinopathy from retinal images. Diabetic retinopathy is a condition that can cause vision loss and blindness in the people who have diabetes. MIA is the process of determining whether a data sample comes from the training data set of a trained ML model or not. From a privacy perspective in our use case where a diabetic retinopathy classification model is given to partners that have at their disposal images along with patients' identifiers, inferring the membership status of a data sample can help to state if a patient has contributed or not to the training of the model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.