Paper detail

When is Nontrivial Estimation Possible for Graphons and Stochastic Block Models?

Block graphons (also called stochastic block models) are an important and widely-studied class of models for random networks. We provide a lower bound on the accuracy of estimators for block graphons with a large number of blocks. We show that, given only the number $k$ of blocks and an upper bound $ρ$ on the values (connection probabilities) of the graphon, every estimator incurs error at least on the order of $\min(ρ, \sqrt{ρk^2/n^2})$ in the $δ_2$ metric with constant probability, in the worst case over graphons. In particular, our bound rules out any nontrivial estimation (that is, with $δ_2$ error substantially less than $ρ$) when $k\geq n\sqrtρ$. Combined with previous upper and lower bounds, our results characterize, up to logarithmic terms, the minimax accuracy of graphon estimation in the $δ_2$ metric. A similar lower bound to ours was obtained independently by Klopp, Tsybakov and Verzelen (2016).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.