Paper detail

Information-theoretic thresholds for community detection in sparse networks

We give upper and lower bounds on the information-theoretic threshold for community detection in the stochastic block model. Specifically, let $k$ be the number of groups, $d$ be the average degree, the probability of edges between vertices within and between groups be $c_\mathrm{in}/n$ and $c_\mathrm{out}/n$ respectively, and let $λ= (c_\mathrm{in}-c_\mathrm{out})/(kd)$. We show that, when $k$ is large, and $λ= O(1/k)$, the critical value of $d$ at which community detection becomes possible -- in physical terms, the condensation threshold -- is \[ d_c = Θ\!\left( \frac{\log k}{k λ^2} \right) \, , \] with tighter results in certain regimes. Above this threshold, we show that the only partitions of the nodes into $k$ groups are correlated with the ground truth, giving an exponential-time algorithm that performs better than chance -- in particular, detection is possible for $k \ge 5$ in the disassortative case $λ< 0$ and for $k \ge 11$ in the assortative case $λ> 0$. (Similar upper bounds were obtained independently by Abbe and Sandon.) Below this threshold, we use recent results of Neeman and Netrapalli (who generalized arguments of Mossel, Neeman, and Sly) to show that no algorithm can label the vertices better than chance, or even distinguish the block model from an Erdős-Rényi random graph with high probability. We also rely on bounds on certain functions of doubly stochastic matrices due to Achlioptas and Naor; indeed, our lower bound on $d_c$ is the second moment lower bound on the $k$-colorability threshold for random graphs with a certain effective degree.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.