ε\varepsilon-isometric dimension reduction for incompressible subsets of ℓp\ell_p

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

Fix p∈[1,∞)p\in[1,\infty), K∈(0,∞)K\in(0,\infty) and a probability measure μμ. We prove that for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, ε∈(0,1)\varepsilon\in(0,1) and x1,…,xn∈Lp(μ)x_1,\ldots,x_n\in L_p(μ) with ∥max⁡i∈{1,…,n}∣xi∣∥Lp(μ)≤K\big\| \max_{i\in\{1,\ldots,n\}} |x_i| \big\|_{L_p(μ)} \leq K, there exists d≤32e2(2K)2plog⁡nε2d\leq \frac{32e^2 (2K)^{2p}\log n}{\varepsilon^2} and vectors y1,…,yn∈ℓpdy_1,\ldots, y_n \in \ell_p^d such that ∀ i,j∈{1,…,n},∥xi−xj∥Lp(μ)p−ε≤∥yi−yj∥ℓpdp≤∥xi−xj∥Lp(μ)p+ε.\forall \ i,j\in\{1,\ldots,n\}, \qquad \|x_i-x_j\|^p_{L_p(μ)}- \varepsilon \leq \|y_i-y_j\|_{\ell_p^d}^p \leq \|x_i-x_j\|^p_{L_p(μ)}+\varepsilon. Moreover, the argument implies the existence of a greedy algorithm which outputs {yi}i=1n\{y_i\}_{i=1}^n after receiving {xi}i=1n\{x_i\}_{i=1}^n as input. The proof relies on a derandomized version of Maurey's empirical method (1981) combined with a combinatorial idea of Ball (1990) and classical factorization theory of Lp(μ)L_p(μ) spaces. Motivated by the above embedding, we introduce the notion of ε\varepsilon-isometric dimension reduction of the unit ball BE{\bf B}_E of a normed space (E,∥⋅∥E)(E,\|\cdot\|_E) and we prove that Bℓp{\bf B}_{\ell_p} does not admit ε\varepsilon-isometric dimension reduction by linear operators for any value of p≠2p\neq2.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.