Paper detail

Using $Λ_b\to Λμ^+μ^-$ data within a Bayesian analysis of $|ΔB| = |ΔS| = 1$ decays

We study the impact of including the baryonic decay $Λ_b\to Λ(\to p π^-)μ^+μ^-$ in a Bayesian analysis of $|ΔB | = |ΔS| = 1$ transitions. We perform fits of the Wilson coefficients $C_{9}$, $C_{9'}$, $C_{10}$ and $C_{10'}$, in addition to the relevant nuisance parameters. Our analysis combines data for the differential branching fraction and three angular observables of $Λ_b\to Λ(\to p π^-)μ^+μ^-$ with data for the branching ratios of $B_s \to μ^+μ^-$ and inclusive $b \to s\ell^+\ell^-$ decays. Newly available precise lattice QCD results for the full set of $Λ_b \to Λ$ form factors are used to evaluate the observables of the baryonic decay. Our fits prefer shifts to $C_{9}$ that are opposite in sign compared to those found in global fits of only mesonic decays, and the posterior odds show no evidence of physics beyond the Standard Model. We investigate a possible hadronic origin of the observed tensions between theory and experiment.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.