Paper detail

Unsupervised Feature Selection via Multi-step Markov Transition Probability

Feature selection is a widely used dimension reduction technique to select feature subsets because of its interpretability. Many methods have been proposed and achieved good results, in which the relationships between adjacent data points are mainly concerned. But the possible associations between data pairs that are may not adjacent are always neglected. Different from previous methods, we propose a novel and very simple approach for unsupervised feature selection, named MMFS (Multi-step Markov transition probability for Feature Selection). The idea is using multi-step Markov transition probability to describe the relation between any data pair. Two ways from the positive and negative viewpoints are employed respectively to keep the data structure after feature selection. From the positive viewpoint, the maximum transition probability that can be reached in a certain number of steps is used to describe the relation between two points. Then, the features which can keep the compact data structure are selected. From the viewpoint of negative, the minimum transition probability that can be reached in a certain number of steps is used to describe the relation between two points. On the contrary, the features that least maintain the loose data structure are selected. And the two ways can also be combined. Thus three algorithms are proposed. Our main contributions are a novel feature section approach which uses multi-step transition probability to characterize the data structure, and three algorithms proposed from the positive and negative aspects for keeping data structure. The performance of our approach is compared with the state-of-the-art methods on eight real-world data sets, and the experimental results show that the proposed MMFS is effective in unsupervised feature selection.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.