Paper detail

Unraveling the graph structure of tabular data through Bayesian and spectral analysis

In the big-data age, tabular data are being generated and analyzed everywhere. As a consequence, finding and understanding the relationships between the features in these data are of great relevance. Here, to encompass these relationships, we propose a graph-based method that allows individual, group and multi-scale analyses. The method starts by mapping the tabular data into a weighted directed graph using the Shapley additive explanations technique. With this graph of relationships, we show that the inference of the hierarchical modular structure obtained by the Nested Stochastic Block Model (nSBM) as well as the study of the spectral space of the magnetic Laplacian can help us identify the classes of features and unravel non-trivial relationships. As a case study, we analyzed a socioeconomic survey conducted with students in Brazil: the PeNSE survey. The spectral embedding of the columns suggested that questions related to physical activities form a separate group. The application of the nSBM approach not only corroborated with that but allowed complementary findings about the modular structure: some groups of questions showed a high adherence with the divisions qualitatively defined by the designers of the survey. As opposed to the structure obtained by the spectrum, questions from the class Safety were partly grouped by our method in the class Drugs. Surprisingly, by inspecting these questions, we observed that they were related to both these topics, suggesting an alternative interpretation of these questions. These results show how our method can provide guidance for tabular data analysis as well as the design of future surveys.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.