Paper detail

Uncertainty of three-nucleon continuum observables arising from uncertainties of two-nucleon potential parameters

Propagation of uncertainties from two-nucleon potential parameters to three-nucleon observables, that is statistical errors for the neutron-deuteron elastic scattering and the deuteron breakup reaction at neutron laboratory energies up to 200 MeV is investigated. To that end we use the chiral nucleon-nucleon interaction with the semi-local momentum-space regularization at various orders of the chiral expansion, exploiting knowledge of the covariance matrix of its parameters. For both reactions we compare statistical uncertainties for chiral predictions with the uncertainties obtained in the same way but for the semi-phenomenological One-Pion-Exchange two-nucleon force. In addition for the elastic scattering we show also the truncation errors arising from restriction to a given order of chiral predictions, estimated among others within the Bayesian method, and the cutoff dependence of chiral predictions. We find that the resulting statistical uncertainty is smaller than the truncation errors for the chiral force at lower orders of the chiral expansion. At the higher orders of the chiral expansion and at low energies the statistical errors exceed the truncation ones but at intermediate and higher energies truncation errors are more important. Overall, magnitudes of the theoretical uncertainties are small and amount up to 0.5\%-4\%, depending on the observable and energy. We also find that the magnitudes of statistical uncertainties for the chiral and semi-phenomenological potentials are similar and that the dependence of predictions on the regularization parameter values is important at all investigated energies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.