Paper detail

Two Stage Non-penalized Corrected Least Squares for High Dimensional Linear Models with Measurement error or Missing Covariates

This paper provides an alternative to penalized estimators for estimation and vari- able selection in high dimensional linear regression models with measurement error or missing covariates. We propose estimation via bias corrected least squares after model selection. We show that by separating model selection and estimation, it is possible to achieve an improved rate of convergence of the L2 estimation error compared to the rate sqrt{s log p/n} achieved by simultaneous estimation and variable selection methods such as L1 penalized corrected least squares. If the correct model is selected with high probability then the L2 rate of convergence for the proposed method is indeed the oracle rate of sqrt{s/n}. Here s, p are the number of non zero parameters and the model dimension, respectively, and n is the sample size. Under very general model selection criteria, the proposed method is computationally simpler and statistically at least as efficient as the L1 penalized corrected least squares method, performs model selection without the availability of the bias correction matrix, and is able to provide estimates with only a small sub-block of the bias correction covariance matrix of order s x s in comparison to the p x p correction matrix required for computation of the L1 penalized version. Furthermore we show that the model selection requirements are met by a correlation screening type method and the L1 penalized corrected least squares method. Also, the proposed methodology when applied to the estimation of precision matrices with missing observations, is seen to perform at least as well as existing L1 penalty based methods. All results are supported empirically by a simulation study.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.