BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Soumendra N. Lahiri

Soumendra N. Lahiri contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STStatistics TheoryMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Multi-Resolution Analysis of Variable Selection for Road Safety in St. Louis and Its Neighboring Area

Generally, Lasso, Adaptive Lasso, and SCAD are standard approaches in variable selection in the presence of a large number of predictors. In recent years, during intensity function estimation for spatial point processes with a diverging number of predictors, many researchers have considered these penalized methods. But we have discussed a multi-resolution perspective for the variable selection method for spatial point process data. Its advantage is twofold: it not only efficiently selects the predictors but also provides the idea of which points are liable for selecting a predictor at a specific resolution. Actually, our research is motivated by the crime and accident occurrences in St. Louis and its neighborhoods. It is more relevant to select predictors at the local level, and thus we get the idea of which set of predictors is relevant for the occurrences of crime or accident in which parts of St. Louis. We describe the simulation results to justify the accuracy of local-level variable selection during intensity function estimation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On optimal block resampling for Gaussian-subordinated long-range dependent processes

Block-based resampling estimators have been intensively investigated for weakly dependent time processes, which has helped to inform implementation (e.g., best block sizes). However, little is known about resampling performance and block sizes under strong or long-range dependence. To establish guideposts in block selection, we consider a broad class of strongly dependent time processes, formed by a transformation of a stationary long-memory Gaussian series, and examine block-based resampling estimators for the variance of the prototypical sample mean; extensions to general statistical functionals are also considered. Unlike weak dependence, the properties of resampling estimators under strong dependence are shown to depend intricately on the nature of non-linearity in the time series (beyond Hermite ranks) in addition the long-memory coefficient and block size. Additionally, the intuition has often been that optimal block sizes should be larger under strong dependence (say $O(n^{1/2})$ for a sample size $n$) than the optimal order $O(n^{1/3})$ known under weak dependence. This intuition turns out to be largely incorrect, though a block order $O(n^{1/2})$ may be reasonable (and even optimal) in many cases, owing to non-linearity in a long-memory time series. While optimal block sizes are more complex under long-range dependence compared to short-range, we provide a consistent data-driven rule for block selection, and numerical studies illustrate that the guides for block selection perform well in other block-based problems with long-memory time series, such as distribution estimation and strategies for testing Hermite rank.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Goodness of fit tests for a class of Markov random field models

This paper develops goodness of fit statistics that can be used to formally assess Markov random field models for spatial data, when the model distributions are discrete or continuous and potentially parametric. Test statistics are formed from generalized spatial residuals which are collected over groups of nonneighboring spatial observations, called concliques. Under a hypothesized Markov model structure, spatial residuals within each conclique are shown to be independent and identically distributed as uniform variables. The information from a series of concliques can be then pooled into goodness of fit statistics. Under some conditions, large sample distributions of these statistics are explicitly derived for testing both simple and composite hypotheses, where the latter involves additional parametric estimation steps. The distributional results are verified through simulation, and a data example illustrates the method for model assessment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2007arXiv

A frequency domain empirical likelihood for short- and long-range dependence

This paper introduces a version of empirical likelihood based on the periodogram and spectral estimating equations. This formulation handles dependent data through a data transformation (i.e., a Fourier transform) and is developed in terms of the spectral distribution rather than a time domain probability distribution. The asymptotic properties of frequency domain empirical likelihood are studied for linear time processes exhibiting both short- and long-range dependence. The method results in likelihood ratios which can be used to build nonparametric, asymptotically correct confidence regions for a class of normalized (or ratio) spectral parameters, including autocorrelations. Maximum empirical likelihood estimators are possible, as well as tests of spectral moment conditions. The methodology can be applied to several inference problems such as Whittle estimation and goodness-of-fit testing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access