Paper detail

Two-dimensional Excitonic Photoluminescence in Graphene on Cu surface

Despite having outstanding electrical properties, graphene is unsuitable for optical devices because of its zero band gap. Here, we report two-dimensional excitonic photoluminescence (PL) from graphene grown on Cu(111) surface, which shows an unexpected remarkably sharp and strong emission near 3.16 eV (full-width at half-maximum $\leq$ 3meV) and multiple emissions around 3.18 eV. As temperature increases, these emissions blue-shift, showing the characteristic negative thermal coefficient of graphene. Observed PLs originate from significantly suppressed dispersion of excited electrons in graphene caused by hybridization of graphene $π$ and Cu d orbitals of the 1st and 2nd Cu layers at a shifted saddle point 0.525(M+K) of Brillouin zone. This finding provides a new pathway to engineering novel optoelectronic graphene devices, whilst maintaining the outstanding electrical properties of graphene.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.