Two-body hadronic weak decays of antitriplet charmed baryons

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

We study Cabibbo-favored (CF) and singly Cabibbo-suppressed (SCS) two-body hadronic weak decays of the antitriplet charmed baryons Λc+Λ_c^+, Ξc0Ξ_c^0 and Ξc+Ξ_c^+ with more focus on the last two. Both factorizable and nonfactorizable contributions are considered in the topologic diagram approach. The estimation of nonfactorizable contributions from WW-exchange and inner WW-emission diagrams relies on the pole model and current algebra. The non-perturbative parameters in both factorizable and nonfactorizable parts are calculated in the MIT bag model. Branching fractions and up-down decay asymmetries for all the CF and SCS decays of antitriplet charmed baryons are presented. The prediction of B(Ξc+→Ξ0π+)\mathcal{B}(Ξ_c^+\to Ξ^0π^+ ) agrees well with the measurements inferred from Belle and CLEO, while the calculated B(Ξc0→Ξ−π+){\cal B}(Ξ_c^0\to Ξ^-π^+) is too large compared to the recent Belle measurement. We conclude that these two Ξc→Ξπ+Ξ_c\toΞπ^+ modes cannot be simultaneously explained within the current-algebra framework for SS-wave amplitudes. This issue needs to be resolved in future study. The long-standing puzzle with the branching fraction and decay asymmetry of Λc+→Ξ0K+Λ_c^+\toΞ^0 K^+ is resolved by noting that only type-II WW-exchange diagram will contribute to this mode. We find that not only the calculated rate agrees with experiment but also the predicted decay asymmetry is consistent with the SU(3)-flavor symmetry approach in sign and magnitude. Likewise, the CF mode Ξc0→Σ+K−Ξ_c^0\to Σ^+K^- and the SCS decays Ξc0→pK−,Σ+π−Ξ_c^0\to pK^-,Σ^+π^- proceed only through type-II WW-exchange. They are predicted to have large and {\it positive} decay asymmetries. These features can be tested in the near future.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.