Paper detail

Twisted bilayer graphene I. Matrix elements, approximations, perturbation theory and a $k\cdot p$ 2-Band model

We investigate the Twisted Bilayer Graphene (TBG) model to obtain an analytic understanding of its energetics and wavefunctions needed for many-body calculations. We provide an approximation scheme which first elucidates why the BM $K_M$-point centered calculation containing only $4$ plane-waves provides a good analytical value for the first magic angle. The approximation scheme also elucidates why most many-body matrix elements in the Coulomb Hamiltonian projected to the active bands can be neglected. By applying our approximation scheme at the first magic angle to a $Γ_M$-point centered model of 6 plane-waves, we analytically understand the small $Γ_M$-point gap between the active and passive bands in the isotropic limit $w_0=w_1$. Furthermore, we analytically calculate the group velocities of passive bands in the isotropic limit, and show that they are \emph{almost} doubly degenerate, while no symmetry forces them to be. Furthermore, away from $Γ_M$ and $K_M$ points, we provide an explicit analytical perturbative understanding as to why the TBG bands are flat at the first magic angle, despite it is defined only by vanishing $K_M$-point Dirac velocity. We derive analytically a connected "magic manifold" $w_1=2\sqrt{1+w_0^2}-\sqrt{2+3w_0^2}$, on which the bands remain extremely flat as $w_0$ is tuned between the isotropic ($w_0=w_1$) and chiral ($w_0=0$) limits. We analytically show why going away from the isotropic limit by making $w_0$ less (but not larger) than $w_1$ increases the $Γ_M$- point gap between active and passive bands. Finally, perturbatively, we provide an analytic $Γ_M$ point $k\cdot p$ $2$-band model that reproduces the TBG band structure and eigenstates in a certain $w_0,w_1$ parameter range. Further refinement of this model suggests a possible faithful $2$-band $Γ_M$ point $k\cdot p$ model in the full $w_0, w_1$ parameter range.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.