Paper detail

Triply-resonant micro-optical parametric oscillators based on Kerr nonlinearity: nonlinear loss, unequal resonance-port couplings, and coupled-cavity implementations

We develop a theoretical model of triply-resonant optical parametric oscillators (OPOs) based on degenerate four-wave mixing (FWM) that includes physics and degrees of freedom relevant to microphotonic (on-chip) device implementations, including nonlinear loss, a general resonant mode field structure, and mode-selective coupling to external ports. The coupled mode theory model addresses the effect of two-photon absorption and free-carrier absorption on parametric gain and oscillation thresholds, and ultimately on the optimum design for an OPO. The model goes beyond a typical free-space cavity configuration by incorporating a full modal analysis that admits distributed modes with non-uniform field distribution, relevant to photonic microcavity systems on chip. This leads to a generalization of the concept of nonlinear figure of merit (NFOM) to a vector of coefficients. In addition, by considering unconstrained signal, pump and idler resonance coupling strengths to excitation ports, not usually available in simple cavity geometry, we show that the efficiency-maximizing design will have unequal external Q for the three resonances. We arrive at generalized formulas for OPO oscillation threshold that include nonlinear absorption and free carrier lifetime, and provide a normalized solution to the design problem in the presence of nonlinear loss in terms of optimum choice of coupling. Based on the results, we suggest a family of coupled-cavity systems to implement optimum FWM, where control of resonant wavelengths can be separated from optimizing nonlinear conversion efficiency, and where furthermore pump, signal, and idler coupling to bus waveguides can be controlled independently, using interferometric cavity supermode coupling as an example. Using the generalized NFOM, we address the efficiency of single and multi-cavity geometry, as well as standing and traveling wave excitation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.