Paper detail

Towards a low cost lead assay technique for drinking water using CMOS sensors

An estimated 26 million people in low- and middle-income countries are at risk of lead exposure and there is no safe threshold for lead ingestion. Radio assay methods are not easily accessible in regions at risk, therefore a low cost and easy to use sensor is desirable. $\textrm{Pb}$ occurs together with traces of radioisotopes with decay energies in the range of $10$ to several \SI{100}{\kilo\electronvolt} and beyond. Such energies are accessible in silicon sensors. We have tested a scientific CMOS (Neo 5.5 sCMOS), optimised for optical wavelengths, as $γ$ detector for radiation in the range of $0$ to a few 10 keV. We find a minimal detectable $^{241}\textrm{Am}$ decay rate of 20 Bq for a < 1.4h measurement. Optimising our analysis software will potentially enable detecting lower rates in the same measurement time. We established that the Neo 5.5 sCMOS allows to measure a spectrum of $^{241}\textrm{Am}$ decay lines. In addition we show that it is possible to enhance the concentration of radioisotopes in water when reducing the water's volume by boiling. The knowledge gained using the scientific CMOS sensor will be transferred to commercial silicon sensors as the chips in smart phones.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.