Paper detail

Topological properties of manifolds admitting a $Y^x$-Riemannian metric

A complete Riemannian manifold $(M, g)$ is a $Y^x_l$-manifold if every unit speed geodesic $γ(t)$ originating at $γ(0)=x\in M$ satisfies $γ(l)=x$ for $0\neq l\in \R$. Bérard-Bergery proved that if $(M^m,g), m>1$ is a $Y^x_l$-manifold, then $M$ is a closed manifold with finite fundamental group, and the cohomology ring $H^*(M, \Q)$ is generated by one element. We say that $(M,g)$ is a $Y^x$-manifold if for every $ε>0$ there exists $l>ε$ such that for every unit speed geodesic $γ(t)$ originating at $x$, the point $γ(l)$ is $ε$-close to $x$. We use Low's notion of refocussing Lorentzian space-times to show that if $(M^m, g), m>1$ is a $Y^x$-manifold, then $M$ is a closed manifold with finite fundamental group. As a corollary we get that a Riemannian covering of a $Y^x$-manifold is a $Y^x$-manifold. Another corollary is that if $(M^m,g), m=2,3$ is a $Y^x$-manifold, then $(M, h)$ is a $Y^x_l$-manifold for some metric $h.$

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.