Paper detail

Timescales: the choreography of classical and unconventional computing

Tasks that one wishes to have done by a computer often come with conditions that relate to timescales. For instance, the processing must terminate within a given time limit; or a signal processing computer must integrate input information across several timescales; or a robot motor controller must react to sensor signals with a short latency. For classical digital computing machines such requirements pose no fundamental problems as long as the physical clock rate is fast enough for the fastest relevant timescales. However, when digital microchips become scaled down into the few-nanometer range where quantum noise and device mismatch become unavoidable, or when the digital computing paradigm is altogether abandoned in analog neuromorphic systems or other unconventional hardware bases, it can become difficult to relate timescale conditions to the physical hardware dynamics. Here we explore the relations between task-defined timescale conditions and physical hardware timescales in some depth. The article has two main parts. In the first part we develop an abstract model of a generic computational system that admits a unified discussion of computational timescales. This model is general enough to cover digital computing systems as well as analog neuromorphic or other unconventional ones. We identify four major types of timescales which require separate considerations: causal physical timescales; timescales of phenomenal change which characterize the ``speed'' of how something changes in time; timescales of reactivity which describe how fast a computing system can react to incoming trigger information; and memory timescales. In the second part we survey twenty known computational mechanisms that can be used to obtain desired task-related timescale characteristics from the physical givens of the available hardware.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.