Researcher profile

Herbert Jaeger

Herbert Jaeger contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Timescales: the choreography of classical and unconventional computing

Tasks that one wishes to have done by a computer often come with conditions that relate to timescales. For instance, the processing must terminate within a given time limit; or a signal processing computer must integrate input information across several timescales; or a robot motor controller must react to sensor signals with a short latency. For classical digital computing machines such requirements pose no fundamental problems as long as the physical clock rate is fast enough for the fastest relevant timescales. However, when digital microchips become scaled down into the few-nanometer range where quantum noise and device mismatch become unavoidable, or when the digital computing paradigm is altogether abandoned in analog neuromorphic systems or other unconventional hardware bases, it can become difficult to relate timescale conditions to the physical hardware dynamics. Here we explore the relations between task-defined timescale conditions and physical hardware timescales in some depth. The article has two main parts. In the first part we develop an abstract model of a generic computational system that admits a unified discussion of computational timescales. This model is general enough to cover digital computing systems as well as analog neuromorphic or other unconventional ones. We identify four major types of timescales which require separate considerations: causal physical timescales; timescales of phenomenal change which characterize the ``speed'' of how something changes in time; timescales of reactivity which describe how fast a computing system can react to incoming trigger information; and memory timescales. In the second part we survey twenty known computational mechanisms that can be used to obtain desired task-related timescale characteristics from the physical givens of the available hardware.

preprint2021arXiv

Dimensions of Timescales in Neuromorphic Computing Systems

This article is a public deliverable of the EU project "Memory technologies with multi-scale time constants for neuromorphic architectures" (MeMScales, https://memscales.eu, Call ICT-06-2019 Unconventional Nanoelectronics, project number 871371). This arXiv version is a verbatim copy of the deliverable report, with administrative information stripped. It collects a wide and varied assortment of phenomena, models, research themes and algorithmic techniques that are connected with timescale phenomena in the fields of computational neuroscience, mathematics, machine learning and computer science, with a bias toward aspects that are relevant for neuromorphic engineering. It turns out that this theme is very rich indeed and spreads out in many directions which defy a unified treatment. We collected several dozens of sub-themes, each of which has been investigated in specialized settings (in the neurosciences, mathematics, computer science and machine learning) and has been documented in its own body of literature. The more we dived into this diversity, the more it became clear that our first effort to compose a survey must remain sketchy and partial. We conclude with a list of insights distilled from this survey which give general guidelines for the design of future neuromorphic systems.