Paper detail

Tight is better: Performance Improvement of the Compressive Classifier Using Equi-Norm Tight Frames

Detecting or classifying already known sparse signals contaminated by Gaussian noise from compressive measurements is different from reconstructing sparse signals, as its objective is to minimize the error probability which describes performance of the detectors or classifiers. This paper is concerned about the performance improvement of a commonly used Compressive Classifier. We prove that when the arbitrary sensing matrices used to get the Compressive Measurements are transformed into Equi-Norm Tight Frames, i.e. the matrices that are row-orthogonal, The Compressive Classifier achieves better performance. Although there are other proofs that among all Equi-Norm Tight Frames the Equiangular tight Frames (ETFs) bring best worst-case performance, the existence and construction of ETFs on some dimensions is still an open problem. As the construction of Equi-Norm Tight Frames from any arbitrary matrices is very easy and practical compared with ETF matrices, the result of this paper can also provide a practical method to design an improved sensing matrix for Compressive Classification. We can conclude that: Tight is Better!

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.