Paper detail

Threadneedle: An Experimental Tool for the Simulation and Analysis of Fractional Reserve Banking Systems

Threadneedle is a multi-agent simulation framework, based on a full double entry book keeping implementation of the banking system's fundamental transactions. It is designed to serve as an experimental test bed for economic simulations that can explore the banking system's influence on the macro-economy under varying assumptions for its regulatory framework, mix of financial instruments, and activities of borrowers and lenders. Support is provided for Basel Capital and central bank reserve regulatory frameworks, inter-bank lending and correct handling of loan defaults within the bank accounting framework. In this paper we provide an overview of the design of Threadneedle, and the rational for the double entry book keeping approach used in its implementation. We then provide evidence from a series of experiments using the simulation that the macro-economic behaviour of the banking system is in some cases sensitive to double entry book keeping ledger definitions, and in particular that loss provisions can be systemically affecting. We also show that credit and money expansion in Basel regulated systems is now dominated by the Basel capital requirements, rather than the older central bank reserve requirements. This implies that bank profitability is now the main factor in providing new capital to support lending, meaning that lowering interest rates can act to restrict loan supply, rather than increasing borrowing as currently believed. We also show that long term liquidity flows due to interest repayment act in favour of the bank making the loan, and do not provide any long term throttling effect on loan expansion and money expansion as has been claimed by Keynes and others.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.