Paper detail

Thin film growth models with long surface diffusion lengths

In limited mobility (LM) models of thin film deposition, the final position of each atom or molecule is chosen according to a set of stochastic rules before the incidence of another atom or molecule. Here we investigate the possibility of a LM model to reproduce features of a more realistic approach that represents the interplay of collective adatom diffusion and the external flux. In the LM model introduced here, each adatom may execute $G$ hops to neighboring columns of the deposit, but a hop attempt from a site with $n$ lateral neighbors has probability $P^n$, with $P<1$. These rules resemble those of the Clarke-Vvedensky (CV) model without energy barriers at step edges, whose main parameters are the diffusion-to-deposition ratio $R$ on terraces and the detachment probability $ε$ per lateral neighbor. At short times, the roughness of the LM model can be written in terms of a scaling function of $G$ and $P$ and the growth exponent is consistent with the Villain-Lai-Das Sarma universality class. The evolution of the surface roughness and of the autocorrelation function of the CV model is reproduced with reasonable accuracy by the LM model with suitable choices of parameters. The increase of the parameters $G$ and $R$ of those models produces smoother film surfaces, while the increase of $P$ and $ε$ smoothen the terrace boundaries at short lengthscales. However, the detachment probabilities of the two models have very different effects on the surface roughness: in the LM model, for fixed $G$, the surface roughness increases as $P$ increases; in the CV model, the surface smoothens as $ε$ increases, for fixed $R$. This result is related to the non-Markovian nature of the LM model, since the diffusivity of an adatom depends on its history at the film surface and may be severely reduced after a detachment from a terrace step.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.