Paper detail

Thermoelectric properties, efficiency and thermal expansion of ZrNiSn half-Heusler by first-principles calculations

In this work, we try to understand the experimental thermoelectric (TE) properties of a ZrNiSn sample with DFT and semiclassical transport calculations using SCAN functional. SCAN and mBJ provide the same band gap $E_{g}$ of $\sim$0.54 eV. This $E_{g}$ is found to be inadequate to explain the experimental data. The better explanation of experimental Seebeck coefficient $S$ is done by considering $E_{g}$ of 0.18 eV which suggests the non-stoichiometry and/or disorder in the sample. Further improvement in the $S$ is done by the inclusion of temperature dependence on chemical potential. In order to look for the possible enhanced TE properties obtainable in ZrNiSn with $E_{g}$ of $\sim$0.54 eV, power factor and optimal carrier concentrations are calculated. The optimal electron and hole concentrations required to attain highest power factors are $\sim$7.6x10$^{19}$ cm$^{-3}$ and $\sim$1.5x10$^{21}$ cm$^{-3}$, respectively. The maximum figure of merit $ZT$ calculated at 1200 K for n-type and p-type ZrNiSn are $\sim$0.6 and $\sim$0.7, respectively. The % efficiency obtained for n-type ZrNiSn is $\sim$5.1 % while for p-type ZrNiSn is $\sim$6.1 %. The $ZT$ are expected to be further enhanced to $\sim$1.2 (n-type) and $\sim$1.4 (p-type) at 1200 K by doping with heavy elements for thermal conductivity reduction. The phonon properties are also studied by calculating dispersion, total and partial density of states. The calculated Debye temperature of 382 K is in good agreement with experimental value of 398 K. The thermal expansion behaviour in ZrNiSn is studied under quasi-harmonic approximation. The average linear thermal expansion coefficient $α_{ave}(T)$ of $\sim$7.8x10$^{-6}$ K$^{-1}$ calculated in our work is quite close to the experimental values.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.