Paper detail

Theory of magnetic enhancement in strontium hexaferrite through Zn-Sn pair substitution

We study the site occupancy and magnetic properties of Zn-Sn substituted M-type Sr-hexaferrite SrFe$_{12-x}$(Zn$_{0.5}$Sn$_{0.5}$)$_x$O$_{19}$ with x = 1 using first-principles total-energy calculations. We find that in a ground-state configuration Zn-Sn ions preferentially occupy $4f_1$ and $4f_2$ sites unlike the model previously suggested by Ghasemi et al. [J. Appl. Phys, \textbf{107}, 09A734 (2010)], where Zn$^{2+}$ and Sn$^{4+}$ ions occupy the $2b$ and $4f_2$ sites. Density-functional theory calculations show that our model has a lower total energy by more than 0.2 eV per unit cell compared to Ghasemi's model. More importantly, the latter does not show an increase in saturation magnetization ($M_s$) compared to the pure $M$-type Sr-hexaferrite, in disagreement with the experiment. On the other hand, our model correctly predicts a rapid increase in $M_s$ as well as a decrease in magnetic anisotropy compared to the pure $M$-type Sr-hexaferrite, consistent with experimental measurements.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.