Paper detail

The $X(4140)$ and $X(4160)$ resonances in the $e^+e^-\to γJ/ψϕ$ reaction

We investigate the $J/ψϕ$ invariant mass distribution of the $e^+e^-\to γJ/ψϕ$ reaction at a center of mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=4.6$~GeV measured by the BESIII collaboration, who concludes that no significant signals are observed for $e^+e^- \to γX(4140)$ because of the low statistics. We show, however, that the three bump structures in the $J/ψϕ$ invariant mass distribution, though given only by three data points, are compatible with the existence of the $X(4140)$ state, appearing as a peak, and a strong cusp structure at the $D^*_s\bar{D}^*_s$ threshold, resulting from the molecular nature of the $X(4160)$ state, which also provides a substantial contribution to the reaction. This is consistent with our previous analysis on the $B^+\to J/ψϕK^+$ decay measured by the LHCb collaboration. We strongly call for the measurement of this process with more statistics to further pin down the nature of the $X(4140)$ and $X(4160)$ resonances.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.