Paper detail

The pure annihilation type B_c to M_2 M_3 decays in the perturbative QCD approach

In the standard model the two-body charmless hadronic $B_c$ meson decays can occur via annihilation diagrams only. In this work, we studied the $B_c \to PP, PV/VP,VV$ decays by employing the perturbative QCD (pQCD) factorization approach. From our calculations, we find that (a) the pQCD predictions for the branching ratios of the considered $B_c$ decays are in the range of $10^{-6}$ to $10^{-8}$; (b) for $B_c \to PV/VP, VV$ decays, the branching ratios of $ΔS= 0$ decays are much larger than those of $ΔS =1$ ones because the different Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa(CKM) factors are involved; (c) analogous to $B \to K η^{(\prime)}$ decays, we find $Br(B_c \to K^+ η^\prime) \sim 10 \times Br(B_c \to K^+ η)$, which can be understood by the destructive and constructive interference between the $η_q$ and $η_s$ contribution to the $B_c \to K^+ η$ and $B_c \to K^+ η^\prime$ decay; (d) the longitudinal polarization fractions of $B_c \to VV$ decays are in the range of $86%-95%$ and play the dominant role; and (e) there is no CP-violating asymmetries for the considered $B_c$ decays because only one type tree operators involved.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.