Paper detail

The Impact of the New $^{65\!}$As(p,$γ$)$^{66\!}$Se Reaction Rate on the Two-Proton Sequential Capture of $^{64}\!$Ge, Weak GeAs Cycles, and Type-I X-Ray Bursts such as the Clocked Burster GS 1826$-$24

We re-assess $^{65}$As(p,$γ$)$^{66}$Se reaction rates based on a set of proton thresholds of $^{66}$Se, $S_\mathrm{p}$($^{66}$Se), estimated from the experimental mirror nuclear masses, theoretical mirror displacement energies, and full $pf$-model space shell-model calculation. The self-consistent relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory is employed to obtain the mirror displacement energies with much reduced uncertainty, and thus reducing the proton-threshold uncertainty up to 161 keV compared to the AME2020 evaluation. Using the simulation instantiated by the one-dimensional multi-zone hydrodynamic code, KEPLER, that closely reproduces the observed GS 1826$-$24 clocked bursts, the present forward and reverse $^{65}$As(p,$γ$)$^{66}$Se reaction rates based on a selected $S_\mathrm{p}$($^{66}$Se) = 2.469$\pm$0.054 MeV, and the latest $^{22}$Mg($α$,p)$^{25}$Al, $^{56}$Ni(p,$γ$)$^{57}$Cu(p,$γ$)$^{58}$Zn, $^{55}$Ni(p,$γ$)$^{56}$Cu, and $^{64}$Ge(p,$γ$)$^{65}$As reaction rates, we find that though the GeAs cycles is weakly established in the rapid-proton capture process path, the $^{65}$As(p,$γ$)$^{66}$Se reaction still strongly characterizes the burst tail end due to the two-proton sequential capture on $^{64}$Ge, not found by Cyburt et al. (2016) sensitivity study. The $^{65}$As(p,$γ$)$^{66}$Se reaction influences the abundances of nuclei $A$ = 64, 68, 72, 76, and 80 up to a factor of 1.4. The new $S_\mathrm{p}$($^{66}$Se) and the inclusion of the updated $^{22}$Mg($α$,p)$^{25}$Al reaction rate increases the production of $^{12}$C up to a factor of $4.5$ that is not observable and could be the main fuel for superburst. The waiting point status of and two-proton sequential capture on $^{64}$Ge, weak-cycle feature of GeAs at region heavier than $^{64}$Ge, and impact of other possible $S_\mathrm{p}$($^{66}$Se) are also discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.