Source author record

Adam Michael Jacobs

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2022arXiv

The Impact of the New 65 ⁣^{65\!}As(p,γγ)66 ⁣^{66\!}Se Reaction Rate on the Two-Proton Sequential Capture of 64 ⁣^{64}\!Ge, Weak GeAs Cycles, and Type-I X-Ray Bursts such as the Clocked Burster GS 1826−-24

We re-assess 65^{65}As(p,γγ)66^{66}Se reaction rates based on a set of proton thresholds of 66^{66}Se, SpS_\mathrm{p}(66^{66}Se), estimated from the experimental mirror nuclear masses, theoretical mirror displacement energies, and full pfpf-model space shell-model calculation. The self-consistent relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory is employed to obtain the mirror displacement energies with much reduced uncertainty, and thus reducing the proton-threshold uncertainty up to 161 keV compared to the AME2020 evaluation. Using the simulation instantiated by the one-dimensional multi-zone hydrodynamic code, KEPLER, that closely reproduces the observed GS 1826−-24 clocked bursts, the present forward and reverse 65^{65}As(p,γγ)66^{66}Se reaction rates based on a selected SpS_\mathrm{p}(66^{66}Se) = 2.469±\pm0.054 MeV, and the latest 22^{22}Mg(αα,p)25^{25}Al, 56^{56}Ni(p,γγ)57^{57}Cu(p,γγ)58^{58}Zn, 55^{55}Ni(p,γγ)56^{56}Cu, and 64^{64}Ge(p,γγ)65^{65}As reaction rates, we find that though the GeAs cycles is weakly established in the rapid-proton capture process path, the 65^{65}As(p,γγ)66^{66}Se reaction still strongly characterizes the burst tail end due to the two-proton sequential capture on 64^{64}Ge, not found by Cyburt et al. (2016) sensitivity study. The 65^{65}As(p,γγ)66^{66}Se reaction influences the abundances of nuclei AA = 64, 68, 72, 76, and 80 up to a factor of 1.4. The new SpS_\mathrm{p}(66^{66}Se) and the inclusion of the updated 22^{22}Mg(αα,p)25^{25}Al reaction rate increases the production of 12^{12}C up to a factor of 4.54.5 that is not observable and could be the main fuel for superburst. The waiting point status of and two-proton sequential capture on 64^{64}Ge, weak-cycle feature of GeAs at region heavier than 64^{64}Ge, and impact of other possible SpS_\mathrm{p}(66^{66}Se) are also discussed.

preprint2022arXiv

The Regulated NiCu Cycles with the new 57^{57}Cu(p,γγ)58^{58}Zn reaction rate and the Influence on Type-I X-Ray Bursts: GS 1826−-24 Clocked Burster

During the X-ray bursts of GS 1826−-24, "clocked burster", the nuclear reaction flow that surges through the rapid-proton capture process path has to pass through the NiCu cycles before reaching the ZnGa cycles that moderate the further extent of hydrogen burning in the region above germanium and selenium isotopes. The 57^{57}Cu(p,γγ)58^{58}Zn reaction located in the NiCu cycles plays an important role in influencing the burst light curves as found by Cyburt et al. (2016). We deduce the 57^{57}Cu(p,γγ)58^{58}Zn reaction rate based on the experimentally determined important nuclear structure information, isobaric-multiplet-mass equation, and large-scale shell model calculations. Based on the isobaric-multiplet-mass equation, we propose a possible order of 11+1^+_1 and 23+2^+_3 dominant resonance states and constrain the resonance energy of the 12+1^+_2 state. The latter reduces the contribution of the 12+1^+_2 dominant resonance state. The new reaction rate is up to a factor of four lower than the Forstner et al. (2001) rate recommended by JINA REACLIB v2.2 at the temperature regime sensitive to clocked bursts of GS 1826−-24. Using the simulation from the one-dimensional implicit hydrodynamic code, KEPLER, to model the thermonuclear X-ray bursts of GS 1826−-24 clocked burster, we find that the new 57^{57}Cu(p,γγ)58^{58}Zn coupled with the latest 56^{56}Ni(p,γγ)57^{57}Cu and 55^{55}Ni(p,γγ)56^{56}Cu reaction rates redistributes the reaction flow in the NiCu cycles and strongly influences the burst ash composition, whereas the 59^{59}Cu(p,αα)56^{56}Ni and 59^{59}Cu(p,γγ)60^{60}Zn reactions suppress the influence of the 57^{57}Cu(p,γγ)58^{58}Zn reaction and diminish the impact of nuclear reaction flow that by-passes the important 56^{56}Ni waiting point induced by the 55^{55}Ni(p,γγ)56^{56}Cu reaction on burst light curve.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.